Sustainability Comparison

BT Group plc vs Vodafone Group Plc Sustainability: SINK Score Comparison

BT Group plc scores 2 points higher than Vodafone Group Plc on SINK's sustainability index.

Question-by-question

How each category compares

Category
BT
Vodafone
Carbon Footprint — Operations
9/10
9/10
Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain
8/10
7/10
Emissions Trajectory
7/10
5/10
Energy Source
7/10
8/10
Nature & Biodiversity Impact
4/10
4/10
Resource Use & Waste
7/10
6/10
Water Impact
5/10
5/10
Targets & Commitments
9/10
9/10
Transparency & Accountability
8/10
8/10
Controversies & Red Flags
9/10
7/10
Frequently asked

BT Group plc vs Vodafone Group Plc, answered.

Which is more sustainable, BT Group plc or Vodafone Group Plc?

BT Group plc is more sustainable according to SINK's open sustainability index, scoring 55/100 vs Vodafone Group Plc's 53/100 — a difference of 2 points.

What is BT Group plc's SINK sustainability score?

BT Group plc scores 55/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Making progress). BT Group demonstrates industry-leading climate ambition with SBTi-validated 1.5°C targets and verified operational emissions cuts of 55% since 2017. Scope 3 reporting is comprehensive but reductions lag targets. Critical weakness: nature and biodiversity impact remains largely unquantified with no formal TNFD disclosure or deforestation commitments.

What is Vodafone Group Plc's SINK sustainability score?

Vodafone Group Plc scores 53/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Making progress). Vodafone has built credible near-term climate targets validated by SBTi and achieved major operational emissions cuts (84% below FY20). Its Scope 3 reporting is granular but inconsistent—declining in FY25 partly through asset sales, not decarbonisation. Nature disclosure remains skeletal; trade association climate alignment is unreviewed.

How does SINK compare BT Group plc and Vodafone Group Plc?

Both companies are rated on the same 10-question SINK rubric: Scope 1/2/3 carbon footprint, energy source, nature and biodiversity, resource use, water, emissions trajectory, science-based targets, transparency, and controversies. Scores are 0–100, based on public data, and fully reproducible.

See the full leaderboard — 500+ companies ranked.

View full leaderboard →