Sustainability Comparison

Novartis vs Roche Holding Sustainability: SINK Score Comparison

Novartis scores 1 point higher than Roche Holding on SINK's sustainability index.

Question-by-question

How each category compares

Category
Novartis
Roche
Carbon Footprint — Operations
8/10
8/10
Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain
7/10
7/10
Emissions Trajectory
7/10
7/10
Energy Source
8/10
8/10
Nature & Biodiversity Impact
5/10
4/10
Resource Use & Waste
7/10
5/10
Water Impact
7/10
5/10
Targets & Commitments
8/10
9/10
Transparency & Accountability
7/10
7/10
Controversies & Red Flags
3/10
6/10
Frequently asked

Novartis vs Roche Holding, answered.

Which is more sustainable, Novartis or Roche Holding?

Novartis is more sustainable according to SINK's open sustainability index, scoring 50/100 vs Roche Holding's 49/100 — a difference of 1 points.

What is Novartis's SINK sustainability score?

Novartis scores 50/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Making progress). Novartis demonstrates solid operational decarbonization and supply-chain engagement but relies heavily on carbon credits for claimed neutrality. Nature strategy is nascent. A 2022 NGO assessment flagged 'very low integrity' targets—since partially addressed by SBTi validation—and the company retains trade association memberships with poor climate records.

What is Roche Holding's SINK sustainability score?

Roche Holding scores 49/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Making progress). Roche has achieved strong operational decarbonisation (46% S1&2 reduction since 2022) and received SBTi validation for net-zero targets — a pharma first. However, nature and biodiversity assessment remains absent, water targets lack absolute reduction commitments, and significant non-environmental regulatory penalties ($433M since 2000) persist alongside VCI trade association misalignment.

How does SINK compare Novartis and Roche Holding?

Both companies are rated on the same 10-question SINK rubric: Scope 1/2/3 carbon footprint, energy source, nature and biodiversity, resource use, water, emissions trajectory, science-based targets, transparency, and controversies. Scores are 0–100, based on public data, and fully reproducible.

See the full leaderboard — 500+ companies ranked.

View full leaderboard →