Danone S.A. scores 9 points higher than The Kraft Heinz Company on SINK's sustainability index.
Danone S.A. is more sustainable according to SINK's open sustainability index, scoring 40/100 vs The Kraft Heinz Company's 31/100 — a difference of 9 points.
The Kraft Heinz Company scores 31/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Below expectations). Kraft Heinz has operational emissions tracking and renewable energy deals in place, but Scope 3 dominates at 95% of total emissions with unverified reduction claims. The company quietly scrubbed 2030 climate targets from its website in 2025, faces greenwashing accusations, and scores C on CDP Climate—a major credibility gap for a company claiming net-zero ambitions.
Danone S.A. scores 40/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Below expectations). Danone achieves strong climate reporting and verified emissions reductions across scopes, backed by SBTi targets and third-party assurance. But greenwashing litigation over plastic recyclability claims, suspension of a carbon offset project after community allegations, and identification as Indonesia's top plastic polluter expose hollow environmental marketing. Plastic-dependent business model remains fundamentally unresolved.
Both companies are rated on the same 10-question SINK rubric: Scope 1/2/3 carbon footprint, energy source, nature and biodiversity, resource use, water, emissions trajectory, science-based targets, transparency, and controversies. Scores are 0–100, based on public data, and fully reproducible.
See the full leaderboard — 500+ companies ranked.
View full leaderboard →