Target Corporation scores 2 points higher than Walmart on SINK's sustainability index.
Target Corporation is more sustainable according to SINK's open sustainability index, scoring 29/100 vs Walmart's 27/100 โ a difference of 2 points.
Walmart scores 27/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Significant gaps). Walmart's sustainability performance is defined by rising absolute emissions despite intensity gains, missed climate targets, and a widening gap between supply chain ambitions and verified delivery. Operations reporting is granular but negative in trajectory. Supply chain engagement lacks rigor, and trade association lobbying contradicts stated climate commitments.
Target Corporation scores 29/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Significant gaps). Target reports comprehensive climate data but lacks third-party verification and shows rising operational emissions since 2019. Supply chain emissions dominate (96.3% of total) with minimal demonstrated reductions. The company faces active greenwashing litigation and lobbies through the US Chamber of Commerce, which opposes climate policy.
Both companies are rated on the same 10-question SINK rubric: Scope 1/2/3 carbon footprint, energy source, nature and biodiversity, resource use, water, emissions trajectory, science-based targets, transparency, and controversies. Scores are 0โ100, based on public data, and fully reproducible.
See the full leaderboard โ 500+ companies ranked.
View full leaderboard โ