Shipping / Logistics

CMA CGM sustainability score: 22/100

22/100
Significant gaps+3 since last review
17th of 18 in Shipping / Logistics

Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)

About CMA CGM

CMA CGM is a French multinational container shipping and logistics company founded in 1999, headquartered in Marseille. Operating a fleet of 593 vessels across global trade routes, it is the world's third-largest container shipper by capacity.

More about CMA CGM

The company provides ocean freight, inland waterway, rail, and road logistics services, serving customers in 160+ countries with approximately 110,000 employees.

Founded 1999Head office Marseille, FranceStaff ~155,000Revenue ~$55.5BWebsite ↗

Our verdict

CMA CGM is the world's third-largest shipping company with an absolute emissions footprint of ~49 Mt CO₂e in 2024—among the largest corporate emitters globally. Total emissions rose 22.5% year-on-year with no credible trajectory toward reduction. Self-set targets lack SBTi validation; the company lobbies against ambitious climate policy while offering carbon offsets to customers.

CMA CGM scores 22/100 (Significant gaps) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score. Last verified May 2026.

That places CMA CGM joint 870th of 934 companies scored, and 17th of 18 in Shipping / Logistics.

The ten questions

What is CMA CGM doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Carbon Footprint: Operations and Carbon Footprint: Supply Chain (6/10, 5/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Energy Source (1/10, 2/10).

What's missing

Where CMA CGM lost points

For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.

  • Emissions from its own operations6/10Its own emissions aren't independently verified or tracked over several years.
  • Emissions from its supply chain5/10Most of its supply-chain (Scope 3) emissions aren't measured.
  • Whether its emissions are falling1/10No evidence its emissions are falling, not even from energy bills or mileage.
  • How clean its energy is2/10No renewable energy tariff or major efficiency investment shown.
  • Its effect on nature2/10No assessment of its effect on nature, and no basic environmental policy.
  • How it uses materials and handles waste3/10No active waste reduction, reuse or repair shown.
  • Its effect on water2/10No monitoring of water use, or no measures to reduce it.
  • Its climate targets3/10No specific targets with dates.
  • How openly it reports5/10No dedicated sustainability role, board oversight or public report.
  • Its record on controversies4/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.

The calculation

How is CMA CGM's SINK score calculated?

Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.

SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale
Industry base impact
Shipping / Logistics sector ceiling.
30 / 100
Performance score
Sum of the ten questions, each scored 0 to 10.
33 / 100
Raw score
Weighted average before scale penalty.
(0.3 × 30) + (0.7 × 33) = 32.1
Scale penalty
Multiplier based on total emissions. Bigger polluters lose more.
× 0.7
Final score
Rounded. Significant gaps.
22 / 100
Where the evidence comes from

What evidence is CMA CGM's score based on?

11 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.

27% of them were published by CMA CGM itself; the rest come from independent sources.

Scored on 7 June 2026 under an earlier version of our method. We're re-checking it under the current method.

[1]Self-reported
2024 CSR Report CMA CGM Group
2025Archived copy from 2025-12-06: the original link no longer opens for us.
Q1Q2Q3Q9
View →
[2]Independent source
DitchCarbon — CMA CGM Emissions Profile
Ongoing
Q1Q2Q3Q8
View →
[3]Public record
EPA Settlement — CMA CGM Clean Water Act Violations
2023
Q5Q7Q10
View →
[4]Public record
Maritime Executive — EPA Fines CMA CGM Ballast Water Violations
2023
Q5
View →
[5]Independent source
BNEF/TNFD Case Study — Nature-Related Financial Risks in Shipping
Unknown
Q5
View →
[6]Self-reported
CMA CGM 2024 Vigilance Plan
2024
Q6
View →
[7]Public record
Safety4Sea — CMA CGM EPA Settlement Ballast Water
2023
Q7
View →
[8]Self-reported
CMA CGM Environmental Services
OngoingArchived copy from 2025-10-20: the original link no longer opens for us.
Q4
View →
[9]Independent source
Sustainable Ships — CMA CGM Regulations & Initiatives
Ongoing
Q4Q8
View →
[10]Independent source
LobbyMap — CMA CGM Climate Change Advocacy
Ongoing
Q9Q10
View →
[11]Public record
TI Insight — CMA CGM 2023 Sustainability Report
2023
Q3
View →

If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.

For CMA CGM

Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)

Free. Once you confirm, this page says “Profile claimed by CMA CGM” and we email you when the score changes. Claiming changes nothing about the score. More than one person can claim a company. Privacy

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Send new evidence, free

    Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.

    How to send evidence →
  • Put your score on your website, free

    It shows the current score and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.

    CMA CGM: SINK sustainability score 22/100.

Track this score

We'll send one email to confirm. Every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy

Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →

We reply within 5 working days.

Want your own page like this?

Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.

Score my business free
CMA CGM in context

How does CMA CGM compare with other shipping / logistics companies?

Where CMA CGM sits among shipping / logistics peers.

Among the 18 major shipping / logistics brands we've scored, CMA CGM sits 17th of 18.

17/18
CMA CGM's rank
32
Industry average
20
Industry low
48
Industry high
See all 18 in Shipping / Logistics →
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

Find your page and claim it, free →

Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score.