Woodside is a major fossil fuel producer with expanding LNG projects, offset-dependent emissions targets, and no absolute Scope 3 reduction plan despite combustion of sold products representing 78–90% of its footprint. Active Federal Court litigation alleges systematic greenwashing; shareholder votes have rejected its climate plan twice with record-breaking majorities. Lobbying via trade associations opposes climate regulations.
This score is built from public data only. If your practice is stronger than your disclosure, submit evidence for review — or challenge any question, free.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Transparency & Accountability (7/10, 6/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Controversies & Red Flags (1/10, 2/10).
12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
Scale penalty 0.82 is derived from operational emissions only — Scope 1+2 = 6.8 Mt CO₂e (the totalEmissions basis). Scope 3 (approximately 84 Mt CO₂e, ~80–90% of Woodside's total footprint, from use of sold products) sits OUTSIDE the scale basis — a known limitation of the physics-first scale penalty for fossil-fuel producers. On a Scope-3-inclusive basis the multiplier would be 0.60 and the score ~18. Validation passed on 14 sources; the adverse evidence (Scope 3 gap, rising emissions, greenwashing litigation, 58% say-on-climate vote against) is externally sourced, while several company-hosted URLs are HTTP 403 bot-blocks, not dead links.
7 of 12 sources are third-party verified or public record.
“Gross equity Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions were 6,616 kt CO2-e, 2.5% fewer than in 2024 despite higher production”
“Woodside reported Scope 1 and 2 gross equity emissions of approximately 6.78 million tons of CO2 equivalent in 2024”
“In 2021, Woodside's Scope 3 emissions were 37.2 Mt CO2e (pre-merger with BHP Petroleum)”
“Woodside's displaying of a 'Net zero by 2050' aspiration on its website excludes Scope 3 emissions, which account for over 90% of Woodside's emissions”
“Woodside's overall emissions are projected to increase 18% by 2028 (from 2022 levels)”
“In 2024, we contributed to Ipieca's feedback on the TNFD's draft Oil and Gas Sector Guidance”
“Through our Water Resource Management Framework, we assess and manage water-related risks across all our activities”
“While Woodside hasn't set a Scope 1, 2, 3 life cycle intensity target like some oil and gas companies”
“We plan to progress a large-scale solar photovoltaic farm, complemented by a battery energy storage system to deliver renewable energy to Pluto LNG”
“Woodside appears to exhibit policy engagement that is oppositional to science-aligned climate policy”
“Woodside, Santos, and Tamboran Resources are assessed to be at significant risk of 'net zero greenwash' due to their policy engagement”
“2024 - 58% vote against Woodside's Climate Transition Action Plan, the world's first majority vote against a company climate plan”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 11 major oil & gas brands we've scored, Woodside Energy sits 1st of 11.
Score history begins —.
As Woodside Energy's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Woodside Energy is an Australian oil and gas producer founded in 1954, headquartered in Perth. It operates liquefied natural gas (LNG) facilities, offshore oil and gas fields, and development projects across Western Australia, Timor-Leste, Senegal, and the Gulf of Mexico. The company is one of Australia's largest energy exporters.
Integrated oil and gas multinational; comparable scale, upstream LNG and renewables portfolio.
View breakdown →Global oil and gas producer with significant LNG operations and downstream refining.
View breakdown →European integrated energy company with LNG, renewables, and transition investments.
View breakdown →Pure-play oil and gas explorer-producer with offshore and LNG asset base.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.