Barclays scores 4 points higher than HSBC Holdings plc on SINK's sustainability index.
Barclays is more sustainable according to SINK's open sustainability index, scoring 39/100 vs HSBC Holdings plc's 35/100 — a difference of 4 points.
Barclays scores 39/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Below expectations). Barclays reports comprehensive operational emissions data with 97% Scope 1+2 reductions, yet remains Europe's largest fossil fuel financier at $35.4B in 2024—increasing year-over-year. The bank lobbies against climate regulation, greenwashes 'sustainable finance' through fossil fuel inclusion, and faces NGO complaints over deforestation-linked bond underwriting. Operational progress masks financed emissions deterioration.
HSBC Holdings plc scores 35/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Below expectations). HSBC is a major global bank that has systematically weakened its climate commitments while continuing heavy fossil fuel financing that dwarfs its green lending. A 2022 ASA ruling found the bank guilty of greenwashing; it exited SBTi validation, delayed net-zero targets by 20 years, and lobbies against climate policy. Operational emissions reporting is competent; financed emissions accountability is nearly absent.
Both companies are rated on the same 10-question SINK rubric: Scope 1/2/3 carbon footprint, energy source, nature and biodiversity, resource use, water, emissions trajectory, science-based targets, transparency, and controversies. Scores are 0–100, based on public data, and fully reproducible.
See the full leaderboard — 500+ companies ranked.
View full leaderboard →