Visa operates a global payments duopoly enabling fossil-fuel commerce at scale without restriction, despite having SBTi-approved climate targets and 100% renewable electricity. Operational emissions rose 12.2% year-on-year; the company relies on offsets for carbon neutrality claims rather than absolute reductions. Nature risk and circular economy targets are absent.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Energy Source and Carbon Footprint — Operations (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Controversies & Red Flags and Emissions Trajectory (3/10, 3/10).
15 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 29 major financial services / banking brands we've scored, Visa Inc. sits 4th of 29.
Score history begins 6 April 2026.
As Visa Inc.'s score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Visa Inc. is a global digital payments network processing card transactions across merchants and financial institutions. Founded in 1958 and headquartered in San Francisco, it forms a de facto duopoly with Mastercard controlling card payment infrastructure across developed and emerging markets, with 31,600 employees and $40 billion in annual revenue.
Co-duopolist in global card payments; identical structural conflict on fossil-sector enablement
View breakdown →Major financial intermediary for fossil-fuel capital; comparable scale and sectoral exposure
View breakdown →Asset manager with structural ties to fossil sectors; similar governance and SBTi commitment complexity
View breakdown →Direct fossil operator vs. indirect enabler; contrasts infrastructure monopoly with commodity extraction carbon intensity
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.