PayPal has delivered real operational emissions cuts—79% reduction since 2019—and maintains 100% renewable energy for data centres. But it processes payments across all merchant categories including fossil fuels without restriction, scoring weak on supply chain transparency and lacking any phase-out commitments. The structural enablement of high-carbon commerce, combined with unverified supplier climate targets, undercuts otherwise solid climate operations work.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Energy Source (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Controversies & Red Flags and Water Impact (4/10, 4/10).
8 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 29 major financial services / banking brands we've scored, PayPal Holdings, Inc. is tied =5th of 29, with 1 other.
Score history begins 6 April 2026.
As PayPal Holdings, Inc.'s score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
PayPal Holdings is a digital payments and financial services company headquartered in San Jose. Founded in 1998 (merged with X.com in 2000), it operates a global payment platform processing transactions across billions of merchants and consumers. It is asset-light, software-driven, and competes with Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, and regional processors.
Payment processor and card network competitor with similar exposure to fossil-sector merchant transactions and comparable climate disclosure maturity.
View breakdown →Fintech payments rival, also asset-light, processing transactions across all sectors without explicit fossil-fuel restrictions.
View breakdown →Large-scale financial institution processing high-carbon commerce; similar structural complicity tension between climate operations and transaction-enablement.
View breakdown →Global financial services player with fossil-sector exposure, recent pressure from NGOs on climate alignment, comparable transparency and commitment scrutiny.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.