Sustainability Comparison

Chevron vs Saudi Aramco Sustainability: SINK Score Comparison

Both companies are tied at 12/100 on SINK's sustainability index.

Question-by-question

How each category compares

Category
Chevron
Saudi
Carbon Footprint — Operations
5/10
5/10
Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain
2/10
0/10
Emissions Trajectory
1/10
0/10
Energy Source
1/10
1/10
Nature & Biodiversity Impact
1/10
2/10
Resource Use & Waste
3/10
3/10
Water Impact
3/10
4/10
Targets & Commitments
1/10
1/10
Transparency & Accountability
4/10
4/10
Controversies & Red Flags
0/10
1/10
Frequently asked

Chevron vs Saudi Aramco, answered.

Which is more sustainable, Chevron or Saudi Aramco?

Both companies are tied at 12/100 on SINK's sustainability index.

What is Chevron's SINK sustainability score?

Chevron scores 12/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Critical concern). Chevron's sustainability record is defined by rising absolute emissions, intensity-only targets that allow production growth to outpace efficiency gains, and systematic obstruction of climate policy. The company reports Scope 1 & 2 emissions with third-party verification but covers only 1 of 15 Scope 3 categories. An unresolved $9.5B judgment for 16 billion gallons of Amazon contamination, FTC greenwashing complaints, and InfluenceMap's ranking as the most obstructive oil company on climate policy expose fundamental misalignment between stated commitments and corporate action.

What is Saudi Aramco's SINK sustainability score?

Saudi Aramco scores 12/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Critical concern). Saudi Aramco is the world's largest corporate emitter, refusing to disclose Scope 3 emissions (~1.6–1.84 Gt CO₂e annually, 4.4% of global emissions). Operational emissions are rising, targets are intensity-only while production expands, and the company actively lobbies against climate action. Scope 3 non-disclosure alone is disqualifying.

How does SINK compare Chevron and Saudi Aramco?

Both companies are rated on the same 10-question SINK rubric: Scope 1/2/3 carbon footprint, energy source, nature and biodiversity, resource use, water, emissions trajectory, science-based targets, transparency, and controversies. Scores are 0–100, based on public data, and fully reproducible.

See the full leaderboard — 500+ companies ranked.

View full leaderboard →