Colgate-Palmolive Company scores 12 points higher than Unilever on SINK's sustainability index.
Colgate-Palmolive Company is more sustainable according to SINK's open sustainability index, scoring 41/100 vs Unilever's 29/100 — a difference of 12 points.
Colgate-Palmolive Company scores 41/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Below expectations). Colgate-Palmolive has validated net-zero targets and strong renewable energy procurement, but emissions are rising in absolute terms and supply chain reductions are severely lagging. Deforestation remains a credible risk despite policy, and regulatory action for greenwashing on recyclability claims reveals a gap between disclosure and market reality.
Unilever scores 29/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Significant gaps). Unilever has reduced operational emissions 77% but Scope 3 is rising, missing 1.5°C targets by 45%. Plastic targets revised downward with 700kt annually still in use. Two regulatory greenwashing findings and a credible NGO report on insufficient climate ambition expose gaps between stated commitments and measurable outcomes.
Both companies are rated on the same 10-question SINK rubric: Scope 1/2/3 carbon footprint, energy source, nature and biodiversity, resource use, water, emissions trajectory, science-based targets, transparency, and controversies. Scores are 0–100, based on public data, and fully reproducible.
See the full leaderboard — 500+ companies ranked.
View full leaderboard →