Vestas leads on renewable electricity sourcing and third-party verified disclosure, but stumbles on absolute emissions reduction and biodiversity. Missing its 2025 Scope 1+2 target, relying on intensity-based Scope 3 metrics, and refusing to set biodiversity targets despite operating in sensitive environments.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Energy Source (8/10, 8/10). Weakest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Water Impact (4/10, 5/10).
17 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 2 major renewable energy / clean energy generation brands we've scored, Vestas Wind Systems sits 2nd of 2.
Score history begins 5 April 2026.
As Vestas Wind Systems's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Vestas Wind Systems is the world's largest wind turbine manufacturer, designing and servicing onshore and offshore wind installations. Headquartered in Denmark since 1945, it dominates global renewable energy hardware with 24% market share. Its emissions footprint is dominated by upstream supply chain (steel) and service vehicle fleet operations.
Fellow Danish renewable energy giant navigating similar Scope 3 supply-chain emissions and biodiversity trade-offs.
View breakdown →Direct competitor in wind turbine manufacturing and service; comparable scale and ESG reporting depth.
View breakdown →Largest US utility with substantial wind portfolio; contrasts Vestas's hardware focus with grid-scale renewable operations.
View breakdown →Oil supermajor pivoting to renewables; reveals how fossil incumbents frame intensity vs. absolute emissions targets.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.