Recently scored: Xylem, Tomra Systems ASA, First Solar, Novonesis
Sustainability Comparison

Henkel AG & Co. KGaA vs The Procter & Gamble Company Sustainability: SINK Score Comparison

Higher score
🧴 FMCG / Consumer Goods
Henkel AG & Co. KGaA
38
out of 100
Below expectations
🧴 FMCG / Consumer Goods
The Procter & Gamble Company
26
out of 100
Significant gaps

Henkel AG & Co. KGaA scores 12 points higher than The Procter & Gamble Company on SINK's sustainability index.

Question-by-question

How each category compares

Category
Henkel
The
Carbon Footprint — Operations
8/10
8/10
Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain
7/10
4/10
Emissions Trajectory
6/10
4/10
Energy Source
6/10
8/10
Nature & Biodiversity Impact
5/10
2/10
Resource Use & Waste
6/10
5/10
Water Impact
5/10
5/10
Targets & Commitments
8/10
5/10
Transparency & Accountability
7/10
6/10
Controversies & Red Flags
7/10
3/10
Full Henkel AG & Co. KGaA breakdown →Full The Procter & Gamble Company breakdown →
Frequently asked

Henkel AG & Co. KGaA vs The Procter & Gamble Company, answered.

Which is more sustainable, Henkel AG & Co. KGaA or The Procter & Gamble Company?

Henkel AG & Co. KGaA is more sustainable according to SINK's open sustainability index, scoring 38/100 vs The Procter & Gamble Company's 26/100 — a difference of 12 points.

What is Henkel AG & Co. KGaA's SINK sustainability score?

Henkel AG & Co. KGaA scores 38/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Below expectations). Henkel reports comprehensive climate data with CDP A rating and SBTi-validated absolute targets, but supply-chain emissions data quality lags operations. Nature biodiversity risks remain largely unquantified despite policy commitments. Water targets are intensity-based, not absolute. Trade association memberships in climate-skeptical bodies create strategic misalignment.

What is The Procter & Gamble Company's SINK sustainability score?

The Procter & Gamble Company scores 26/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Significant gaps). P&G achieves strong operational emissions reductions but masks a fundamentally unaligned business model. Scope 3 emissions rising 22.7% annually puts the company on a +3°C trajectory. Five active greenwashing lawsuits, NRDC SEC complaint, and documented boreal forest degradation reveal systematic misleading of investors on core sustainability claims.

How does SINK compare Henkel AG & Co. KGaA and The Procter & Gamble Company?

Both companies are rated on the same 10-question SINK rubric: Scope 1/2/3 carbon footprint, energy source, nature and biodiversity, resource use, water, emissions trajectory, science-based targets, transparency, and controversies. Scores are 0–100, based on public data, and fully reproducible.

See the full leaderboard — 500+ companies ranked.

View full leaderboard →