Sustainability Comparison

Lloyds Banking Group vs NatWest Group Sustainability: SINK Score Comparison

NatWest Group scores 2 points higher than Lloyds Banking Group on SINK's sustainability index.

Question-by-question

How each category compares

Category
Lloyds
NatWest
Carbon Footprint — Operations
8/10
8/10
Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain
6/10
7/10
Emissions Trajectory
4/10
7/10
Energy Source
8/10
8/10
Nature & Biodiversity Impact
5/10
5/10
Resource Use & Waste
4/10
4/10
Water Impact
5/10
4/10
Targets & Commitments
5/10
5/10
Transparency & Accountability
7/10
8/10
Controversies & Red Flags
4/10
5/10
Frequently asked

Lloyds Banking Group vs NatWest Group, answered.

Which is more sustainable, Lloyds Banking Group or NatWest Group?

NatWest Group is more sustainable according to SINK's open sustainability index, scoring 40/100 vs Lloyds Banking Group's 38/100 — a difference of 2 points.

What is Lloyds Banking Group's SINK sustainability score?

Lloyds Banking Group scores 38/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Below expectations). Lloyds has solid operational decarbonisation and renewable energy credentials, but its financed emissions—33 MtCO₂e annually—dwarf these gains. A 3.1:1 fossil fuel to green financing ratio, £16B in fossil fuel lending 2016-2023, and a December 2024 ASA greenwashing ban expose a bank financing climate destruction while reporting progress.

What is NatWest Group's SINK sustainability score?

NatWest Group scores 40/100 on the SINK sustainability index (Below expectations). NatWest has cut operational emissions 66% since 2019 and achieved 100% renewable electricity, but undermined these gains by voluntarily withdrawing SBTi validation in 2025 and weakening oil & gas lending policy in February 2026. Fossil fuel financing rose 31% year-on-year; financed emissions remain the dominant unresolved impact.

How does SINK compare Lloyds Banking Group and NatWest Group?

Both companies are rated on the same 10-question SINK rubric: Scope 1/2/3 carbon footprint, energy source, nature and biodiversity, resource use, water, emissions trajectory, science-based targets, transparency, and controversies. Scores are 0–100, based on public data, and fully reproducible.

See the full leaderboard — 500+ companies ranked.

View full leaderboard →