Accenture presents a paradox: strong operational carbon reductions offset by rising absolute Scope 3 emissions and reliance on intensity-based targets that permit growth. Its clean energy procurement relies heavily on unbundled RECs. Trade association membership in climate-obstructing groups (NAM, US Chamber) directly contradicts its stated climate commitments.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Transparency & Accountability (8/10, 8/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Water Impact (3/10, 5/10).
13 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 8 major consulting / professional services brands we've scored, Accenture sits 3rd of 8.
Score history begins 11 April 2026.
As Accenture's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Accenture is a Dublin-headquartered multinational consulting, technology services, and outsourcing company employing over 750,000 people globally. It serves clients across sectors in digital transformation, cloud migration, and enterprise software. As a knowledge-intensive business with no manufacturing or extraction footprint, its sustainability profile is shaped primarily by business travel, supply chain procurement, and office operations.
Peer professional services firm with similar low operational footprint but also trade association membership conflicts.
View breakdown →Tech/consulting services player with strong renewable energy claims and net-zero targets; useful intensity-vs-absolute comparison.
View breakdown →Global IT services company with comparable Scope 3 emissions dominance and similar supplier engagement challenges.
View breakdown →Tech sector peer with more aggressive absolute Scope 3 reduction targets and carbon removal investments; benchmark for consulting-adjacent sectors.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.