Healthcare / Pharmaceuticals·Woonsocket, Rhode Island, United States·Founded 1996

CVS Health sustainability score: 37/100

CVS Health runs pharmacy benefit management (CVS Caremark), Aetna health insurance and retail pharmacies in the United States.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

Pending reviewStrong evidence· 14 src

CVS Health's Scope 1 and 2 emissions are down 43% since 2019 with reasonable assurance, though Scope 1 rose in 2025, and its Scope 3 total of 26.3 Mt has not fallen steadily. Renewable electricity was 33% in 2025 against a 50% target for 2040. Its 2025 report says it moved away from material-specific plastic goals, which its packaging page still lists, and it publishes no financed emissions for Aetna's investments.

CVS Health scores 37/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified October 2026.

That places CVS Health joint 435th of 847 companies scored, and joint 16th of 19 in Healthcare / Pharmaceuticals.

At a glance

CVS Health's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Emissions from its own operations8/10
  • Its climate targets8/10
Weakest
  • Its effect on nature4/10
  • How it uses materials and handles waste4/10
See all ten questions ↓
CVS Health in context

How does CVS Health compare with other healthcare / pharmaceuticals companies?

Where CVS Health sits among healthcare / pharmaceuticals peers.

Among the 19 major healthcare / pharmaceuticals brands we've scored, CVS Health is tied =16th of 19, with 1 other.

=16/19
CVS Health's rank
44
Industry average
33
Industry low
53
Industry high
See all 19 in Healthcare / Pharmaceuticals →
What would raise this score

Where CVS Health lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Its effect on nature4/10

    No quantified nature footprint, TNFD-aligned disclosure, or verified deforestation-free supply chain documented.

  2. How it uses materials and handles waste4/10

    Previous 50% virgin-plastic reduction goal (by 2030) is no longer visible as a measurable commitment.

  3. Its effect on water4/10

    No reduction target set.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For CVS Health

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is CVS Health doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Targets & Commitments (8/10, 8/10). Weakest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Resource Use & Waste (4/10, 4/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 14 sources.

About CVS Health

CVS Health runs pharmacy benefit management (CVS Caremark), Aetna health insurance and retail pharmacies in the United States. Incorporated in Delaware in 1996 and headquartered in Woonsocket, Rhode Island, it had about 300,000 employees and $402.1 billion in FY2025 revenue.

Founded
1996
Headquarters
Woonsocket, Rhode Island, United States
Employees
~300,000 (FY2025)
Annual revenue
$402,067M total revenues (FY2025)
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.