How scores work / Full methodology

The full methodology

Version v2.5.16, last changed 17 October 2026.

This is every rule we use to score a company. If you want the short version first, start with how scores work.

The formula

How the numbers fit together

Score = (0.3 × starting point + 0.7 × questions) × size multiplier

The industry starting point and the ten questions are both out of 100. We take 30% of the first and 70% of the second. The industry matters, but what a company does matters more.

Then we multiply by the size multiplier, which is between 0.60 and 1.00. We round once, at the end, to a whole number.

A live example

This reads the company’s current score from our database, so it always matches its company page.

Apple Inc. · Electronics / Hardware
Last scored 17 October 2026
40
out of 100
Below expectations
Industry starting point40

Electronics / Hardware starts at 40.

Ten questions65

The ten question scores added up, out of 100.

Before the size deduction0.3 × 40 + 0.7 × 65 = 57.5

30% of the starting point plus 70% of the questions.

Size deduction× 0.70

Apple Inc. reports about 15.3 million tonnes a year, so 30% comes off.

Score40

57.5 × 0.70 ≈ 40. Below expectations.

The ten questions

What each score from 0 to 10 means

Every company gets the same ten questions. The first seven are about physical harm. The last three are about whether the company is improving, and whether it can be held to account.

Each question has four fixed points: 0, 3, 6 and 10. A score in between shows how close the company is to the next point. Energy bills, supplier records and water bills count at every level, so you don’t need formal reporting to score well.

Q1Own emissions

Does it measure and publish the emissions from its own sites and vehicles (Scope 1 and 2)?

0
No data of any kind
3
Energy bills or fuel records, no formal calculation
6
Full Scope 1 and 2, worked out to the GHG Protocol or similar
10
Checked by an outside party, detailed, public, and falling
Q2Supply chain emissions

Does it know the emissions in its supply chain and from its products in use (Scope 3)?

0
Knows nothing about its supply chain's emissions
3
Can name its main suppliers and where they are
6
Has measured most of the Scope 3 categories that matter for it
10
Full Scope 3, checked by an outside party, and working with suppliers to cut it
Q3Direction of travel

Are its emissions actually going down, year on year?

0
No data, or emissions rising
3
Flat or falling, but little evidence
6
Shown to fall in absolute terms, year on year
10
On track for 1.5°C across all its emissions
Q4Energy

How much of its energy comes from renewable sources?

0
No renewable energy and no plan to use less
3
Uses energy more efficiently, but on a standard tariff
6
50 to 90% renewable with a clear plan, or generates its own
10
100% renewable in its own operations, and helping suppliers switch
Q5Nature

What does it do to forests, land and wildlife?

0
No awareness of its effect on nature
3
Avoids the worst practices, for example certified timber, no palm oil
6
Has measured its effect on nature, no deforestation, reports to TNFD
10
Leaves nature better off, with results it can measure
Q6Resources and waste

Does it reuse and recycle, or make, use and throw away?

0
Make, use, throw away, with no waste plan
3
Basic recycling and some awareness of waste
6
Measurable targets for reuse, and rules for suppliers
10
Materials go round in a closed loop, and the whole supply chain is open
Q7Water

How much water does it use, and does it pollute any?

0
No water data, or serious pollution with nothing done about it
3
Knows how much water it uses, and pollution risk is low
6
Has measured its water use, set targets to cut it, and had it checked
10
Puts back as much water as it takes or more, and can show the benefit
Q8Targets

Does it have targets backed by science, and does it cut before it offsets?

0
No targets, and leans on cheap offsets
3
Informal goals, or offsets of unclear quality
6
Signed up to the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), cutting first
10
SBTi has approved its near-term and long-term targets, with a path to net zero
Q9Openness

Does it publish what it does, and who at the top answers for it?

0
Publishes nothing about its environmental record
3
The owner cares, but there's no formal structure
6
A named role, reports to TCFD or CSRD, and board oversight
10
Its purpose is written into how it's run (for example B Corp), and anyone can check everything
Q10Red flags

Any pollution cases, fines, or lobbying against climate action?

0
Major investigations, environmental damage, or lobbying against climate action
3
Several complaints or fines, or trade groups that work against climate action
6
Minor issues dealt with in the open, no lobbying against climate action
10
Clean record, owns up to problems early, and speaks up for climate action
Industry starting points

Where each industry starts

Each industry gets a starting point out of 100. It reflects the harm its core work does, whoever does it. Higher means less harm. Tap any row to see why.

IndustryStart

We add industries as we score new kinds of company. Our editors set each starting point, and you can challenge any of them with evidence.

The size deduction

Bigger polluters lose more

What matters to the planet is total tonnes, whatever the company’s size. So we multiply by a figure set by the company’s total yearly emissions. That’s its own operations (Scope 1 and 2) plus its supply chain and products in use (Scope 3).

Total emissions a yearMultiplier
Under 100,000 tonnes
Nothing off
1.00×
100,000 to 1 million tonnes
5% off
0.95×
1 to 10 million tonnes
18% off
0.82×
10 to 50 million tonnes
30% off
0.70×
Over 50 million tonnes
40% off, the most
0.60×

If we can’t find an emissions figure

We still score the company, with a 0.70× multiplier. That’s 30% off, the same as a company emitting 10 to 50 million tonnes.

We use two labels, and never claim more than we know. “Not retrieved” means our search didn’t turn up a figure we could cite. It doesn’t mean the company publishes nothing. “No public figure” is only used once we’ve confirmed the company doesn’t publish one.

Very small companies are the exception: fewer than 250 staff and revenue under £50 million. For them we treat the figure as an estimate and don’t apply the 0.70×. The exception never applies when we don’t know the revenue. It also never applies to heavy industries (oil and gas, mining, coal, chemicals, cement and glass) or to financial firms. A financial firm’s emissions sit in what it funds, whatever the size of its offices.

If a total leaves out the supply chain

In some industries most emissions sit in the supply chain or in products in use. There, a total that leaves out Scope 3 is treated as incomplete. The multiplier is capped at 0.70×, and a person checks the score before it goes live.

If a total looks far too big

We check every total against a ceiling for its industry, to catch figures that can’t be real. If a total is over the ceiling, we throw it out. The exception is a figure in the company’s own report, where the report says an outside party checked it. We use that figure, and a person checks the score before it goes live.

Industry-specific rules

Three industries with their own rules

Water and sewerage

Water companies have their own industry, starting at 40. Their size multiplier uses only their own operations’ emissions (Scope 1 and 2), so reporting the supply chain in full can’t push a company into a bigger deduction. We credit supply chain reporting in question 2 instead.

Banks, insurers and investors

A financial firm does most of its harm through what it lends to, invests in and insures (financed emissions). If a bank publishes its financed emissions on the standard basis (PCAF) in its own report, we use that figure. If it doesn’t, its multiplier is capped at 0.70× and a person checks the score before it goes live.

Jewellery and watches

Jewellery and watch makers have their own industry, starting at 40, level with electronics. Gold, diamonds and gemstones take a lot of mining, but the products are made in small numbers and last for decades. Smartwatches stay with electronics, leather goods with clothing, and perfume with consumer goods.

The bands

How to read a score

86+
Near the frontier
Close to the best possible. It would take top marks on almost everything, at scale.
75–85
Exceptional
Best in class. Very few companies get here.
60–74
Leading practice
Real leadership, backed by checked data and science-based targets.
46–59
Making progress
Real effort, with clear room to improve.
31–45
Below expectations
Some action, but big gaps.
16–30
Significant gaps
Major gaps in what it reports or what it does.
0–15
Critical concern
Little effort, or doing active harm.

We score every company the same way, and the questions ask a lot. Most companies land between 30 and 60, and scores above 75 are very rare. A score of 60 or more takes real leadership: checked data, science-based targets and open governance.

Sourcing rules

What counts as evidence

A full score cites at least 8 live sources. No more than 70% of them can come from one website. At least 3 must come from outside the company: national emissions registers, CDP, the Science Based Targets initiative, official filings, journalism or standards bodies. The company’s own website, microsites and press releases don’t count as outside sources.

We don’t use websites that repackage other people’s figures (data aggregators). You can’t trace their numbers back to where they came from. Every link must be live when we publish.

Filed annual reports

An audited annual report filed at Companies House counts as one outside source. We discount a company’s own website because nobody checked it. A filed report has been audited and lodged with the official registrar. It counts once per company, however many filings we cite, and it’s never enough on its own.

Some companies file their report as a scanned picture. We read those with text recognition (OCR), so their emissions figures can be quoted and cited like any other source. We won’t mark a company down because we couldn’t read its file.

Official returns

Some organisations must send measured data to a public body they don’t control. UK universities and the HESA estates return were the first case. When a record cites a return like that, up to 85% of sources can come from one website. The publisher also counts as an outside source.

When there’s less evidence

Some companies publish too little to reach 8 sources from 3 outside parties. If every quality check still passes, we publish the score as provisional. The page carries a banner with the real counts, and a note on what’s missing and what would close the gap. We never pad the source list.

Faulty evidence still blocks a score at any level: a dead link, a data aggregator, or a score that rests on one website. A banner can’t fix those.

Why some companies score lower than they should

Public evidence is the right place to start, because anyone can check it. Its weakness is that a company doing good work quietly scores below one doing average work loudly.

Scoring low on something you do well? Here’s how companies can show us their evidence →

Sector rules

How we decide a company’s industry

A company’s industry sets its starting point, the questions’ detail and the companies it’s compared with. One mistake there becomes three. So we look it up from outside sources before we score, in this order:

  1. Index classifications. ICB for FTSE companies and GICS for S&P 500 companies. The index provider sets these by where most revenue comes from, and reviews them every year.
  2. Official register codes. Companies House codes in the UK, SEC codes in the US. We ignore codes that only say “head office” or “holding company”, because they tell us nothing.
  3. Wikidata, and only when there is nothing else, a decision by our editors. We flag both.

If the sources agree, we score the company. If a source of the same or higher rank disagrees, we hold the company for a person to look at. A lower-ranked source that disagrees is noted, and doesn’t hold anything up.

We classify a company by what it makes, whatever sector it sells to. A maker of ground equipment for airlines or carmakers is scored on its own products. It isn’t scored on the emissions of the planes or cars.

Every company page shows where its industry came from, the code that source used, and the date. If you think it’s wrong, you can see exactly how we got there.

Net Positive badge

For companies that remove more than they emit

◉ Net PositiveShown next to the score

This badge is for companies whose main business removes more greenhouse gas than it creates. It sits next to the score and doesn’t change it. A company needs all three:

  1. Its main purpose is restoring nature or removing carbon. An offset scheme added on the side doesn’t count.
  2. It removes more than it emits across all its emissions, and an outside party has checked that.
  3. It uses a credible way of removing carbon, like direct air capture, lasting reforestation, or nature restoration you can measure.

Companies can’t pay for this badge.

Verification levels

Pending review and Verified

Every score starts as “Pending review”. That means it’s live, and anyone can challenge it.

The next level is “Verified”. An editor would give it once a score has held steady over time, with evidence from readers behind it. No score has reached Verified yet.

Verified is never automatic. A vote count can’t trigger it, and a Verified score can still be challenged.

Challenging a score

No score is final

Every question on every company page has a Challenge button. Pick the score you think is right, add a link to your evidence, and send it. It’s free, and anyone can do it.

Challenges are public. If the evidence supports a different score, we change it, credit you, and log the change on the company’s page for good. A challenge can move a score up or down.

We’d rather be corrected than stay wrong.

Changelog

Every change to the methodology

Changes that affect scores, newest first. A score only moves when that company is re-scored, and every move is logged on its page.

v2.5.16October 2026
  • A company's own reported emissions can always make its size deduction bigger, never smaller. When a total looks too big for its industry, we now check the company's own report. If the figures are there and they mean a bigger deduction, we use them, whether or not an outside party checked them.
  • A figure that would make the deduction smaller still needs an outside check. Numbers that appear in none of the company's own documents are still thrown out. Scores move only when a company is re-scored, and each change is logged on its page.
v2.5.15October 2026
  • Banks and insurers have their size multiplier capped unless they report the emissions of what they lend to, invest in or insure. Now, if one publishes that figure in its own report, worked out to the industry standard (PCAF), we use it. We check the figure against the report and show it on the company's page.
  • Figures from news articles or other people's estimates don't count. Scores move only when a company is re-scored, and each change is logged on its page.
v2.5.14October 2026
  • We check every emissions total against a ceiling for its industry, to throw out figures too big to be real. That check was also throwing out real figures. Now, if a company's own report says an outside party checked its total, we use it for the size deduction. A person then checks the score before it goes live.
  • This mattered for a retailer whose total was mostly the energy used by the products it sells. Its figure was thrown out, so it got a smaller deduction than its real total earns. Scores move only when a company is re-scored, and each change is logged on its page.
v2.5.13October 2026
  • New industry: Jewellery & Watches, starting at 40. These companies had been fitted into consumer goods, an industry built for products that get used up and thrown away. Gold, diamonds and gemstones take a lot of mining, but the products are made in small numbers, last decades and are often recycled. So the industry sits level with electronics.
  • Smartwatches stay with electronics, leather goods and luxury clothing with apparel, and perfume with consumer goods. Scores move only when a company is re-scored, and each change is logged on its page.
v2.5.12October 2026
  • For water and sewerage companies, the size deduction now uses only their own operations' emissions. Before, a water company that reported its supply chain in full could land in a bigger deduction than one that reported less. Fuller reporting was costing it points.
  • Supply chain reporting still earns credit, in question 2. Every other industry is unchanged. Scores move only when a company is re-scored, and each change is logged on its page.
v2.5.11October 2026
  • New industry: Water & Sewerage, starting at 40. Water companies had been scored as energy suppliers (55). Pumping and treating water uses a lot of electricity. Treating sewage gives off nitrous oxide and methane, and the business discharges into rivers and the sea. That makes it heavier than selling energy.
  • Most of a water company's footprint is its own operations, so a normal water report is no longer read as missing its supply chain. Emissions from customers heating water at home are left out of the size figure, because few water companies report them. The figure is still shown.
  • No score changes until a water company is re-scored, and each change is logged on its page.
v2.5.10September 2026
  • A score that passes every quality check, but has fewer sources than our full bar, can now be published as provisional. A banner on the page says how many sources it has and what's missing. The bar itself hasn't moved. Faulty evidence still blocks a score: dead links, data aggregators, or a score that rests on one website.
v2.5.9September 2026
  • Some records cite measured data from an official return, published by a body the organisation doesn't control. UK universities and the HESA estates return were the first case. For these records, up to 85% of sources can come from one website, up from 70%, and the publisher counts as an outside source. Everywhere else the old rules stand.
v2.5.8September 2026
  • An audited annual report filed at Companies House now counts as one outside source. We discount a company's own website because nobody checked it. A filed report has been audited, and getting it wrong is an offence. It counts once per company, however many filings we cite, and is never enough on its own.
  • We now read scanned annual reports with text recognition (OCR). Many large UK companies file their report as a picture. Across five FTSE 100 companies, 617 pages gave us no readable text, so companies that had filed audited emissions looked as if they hadn't. We shouldn't mark a company down because we couldn't read its file.
v2.5.7September 2026
  • Banks, insurers, asset managers and investment trusts that don't publish the emissions of what they fund or insure now have their size multiplier capped at 0.70×. Those financed emissions are most of a financial firm's real effect. A report covering only its offices can look complete while leaving out everything it funds.
v2.5.6August 2026
  • New industry: Professional Sports Clubs, starting at 45. Most of a club's footprint is travel: fans going to one ground 19 or more times a season, plus the team's own travel. No existing score changed.
v2.5.5August 2026
  • Two new industries: Airlines / Aviation (28) and Metals & Smelting (20). All 24 airlines had been scored as aerospace (38). Airlines burn fuel and aerospace companies build aircraft, so 38 was too kind. 25 records moved, and each move is logged on its company page.
v2.5.4August 2026
  • In industries where most emissions sit in the supply chain, a company reporting only its own operations no longer gets the smaller deduction a full report earns. We had been reading an incomplete total as a small one.
v2.5.3August 2026
  • Every score must now cite at least 8 different live sources. No more than 70% can come from one website. At least 3 must come from outside the company: registers, CDP, SBTi, official filings, journalism or standards bodies. A company's own website, microsites and press releases don't count as outside sources. This moved scores.
v2.5.2August 2026
  • A company with no usable public emissions figure is now scored with a 0.70× size multiplier, instead of being left out. We label it with care. “Not retrieved” means our search didn't find a figure. It doesn't mean the company publishes nothing, because plenty of large companies that do publish get missed in a single search.
v2.5.1July 2026
  • A company's industry is now looked up from outside sources. It used to be decided during scoring, the only input with no source behind it. We now check ICB or GICS first, then Companies House or SEC filings, then Wikidata, and show the source on each company page. Industry sets the starting point, so this matters.
v2.5May 2026
  • The size deduction is now applied by code, and worked out again from reported emissions every time a company is scored. We ran it across every existing score: 47 moved, most of them down. Every move is shown on the company's own page, old score next to new.
  • Question 10 gained new levels. They tell apart a company that is helping fossil fuel expansion from one that is only exposed to it.
v2.2July 2026
  • New industry: Building Materials / Ceramics / Glass / Cement (28). It covers cement, glass, ceramics, brick and other mineral building products. These companies used to fall under Construction / Real Estate (35). Firing mineral products is heavier work than putting buildings together from them.
v2.1June 2026
  • New industry: Industrial Equipment / Machinery (44). It covers equipment that doesn't fly, drive or burn fuel in use, so most of its harm is in making it.
  • Classification rule 5: we classify a company by what it makes, whatever sector it sells to. A maker of ground equipment for aerospace, defence or car customers is scored on its own products.
  • Sourcing policy published. If a company publishes too little to reach our usual number of sources, we publish its score with every source we checked and never pad the list. A note on the record says so.
v2.0April 2026, new page layout
  • A new layout on every company page: sources tracked for each question, a written summary, and a paragraph of evidence for each question. The questions didn't change. Lobbying is still assessed under Red flags (question 10).
v2.0April 2026, new questions
  • We rewrote the questions to measure what happens to the planet, instead of how polished a company's reporting is.
  • The ten questions became seven about physical harm (carbon, energy, nature, resources and water) and three about accountability.
  • New questions: Nature (question 5) and Water (question 7).
  • Offsets moved into Targets (question 8). Governance moved into Openness (question 9). Lobbying moved into Red flags (question 10).
  • Small companies can now score well without formal reports. Energy bills, supplier records and water bills count at every level.
  • Starting points changed: Financial Services 65 to 50 (financed emissions), Healthcare 55 to 45 (chemical manufacturing, water pollution), Construction 40 to 35 (concrete, building materials), Meat and dairy 35 to 30 (methane, deforestation), Fast fashion 20 to 15 (water pollution, microplastics, waste).
  • New industries: Renewable Energy (75), Consulting / Professional Services (65), Energy Supply / Utilities (55), Hospitality / Hotels (45), Food Service / Restaurants (45), E-commerce / Online Retail (40), Ride-hailing / Mobility Platforms (30).
  • Every existing company was re-scored.
v1.3March 2026
  • We published the reasons behind every industry starting point. SaaS moved from 75 to 70, Electronics from 45 to 40, and Durable apparel from 25 to 30. We added a note on scores between the fixed points, and rules for sources.
v1.1First public release
  • The formula, the ten questions, the industry table, the size deduction, the bands, the verification levels and the challenge process.

Every company page shows its own working: the starting point, the ten question scores with evidence and sources, and the size deduction.