Airports / Transport Infrastructure·Gatwick, West Sussex, United Kingdom·Founded 1986

Gatwick Airport sustainability score: 39/100

Gatwick Airport Limited owns and operates London Gatwick, the UK's second-largest airport by passenger numbers, which handled 42.8 million passengers in 2025.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

Pending reviewStrong evidence· 14 src

Gatwick cut its Scope 1 emissions 34% since 2021, but its total reported footprint rose 1.4% in 2025 as reported aircraft emissions climbed. The Northern Runway expansion was approved despite the examining authority's warning that its emissions could materially affect UK carbon targets. Its net-zero claims rest partly on offsets and on renewable electricity certificates.

Gatwick Airport scores 39/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified October 2026.

That places Gatwick Airport joint 385th of 847 companies scored, and 2nd of 2 in Airports / Transport Infrastructure.

At a glance

Gatwick Airport's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Emissions from its own operations8/10
  • Emissions from its supply chain6/10
Weakest
  • Whether its emissions are falling4/10
  • Its effect on water4/10
See all ten questions ↓
Gatwick Airport in context

How does Gatwick Airport compare with other airports / transport infrastructure companies?

Gatwick Airport sits at the bottom of the airports / transport infrastructure pack.

Among the 2 major airports / transport infrastructure brands we've scored, Gatwick Airport sits 2nd of 2.

2/2
Gatwick Airport's rank
40
Industry average
39
Industry low
41
Industry high
1Heathrow Airport
41
2Gatwick Airport
39
See all 2 in Airports / Transport Infrastructure →
What would raise this score

Where Gatwick Airport lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Whether its emissions are falling4/10

    Scope 1+2+3 rose from 4,405,177t (2024) to 4,465,711t (2025).

  2. Its effect on water4/10

    Reedbed treatment system designed but not built.

  3. Its climate targets4/10

    No SBTi commitment found.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For Gatwick Airport

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is Gatwick Airport doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (8/10, 6/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Water Impact (4/10, 4/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 14 sources.

About Gatwick Airport

Gatwick Airport Limited owns and operates London Gatwick, the UK's second-largest airport by passenger numbers, which handled 42.8 million passengers in 2025. It has been majority-owned by VINCI Airports since 2019 and serves leisure and business travel in South East England. Revenue in 2025 was £1,132.1M, with about 2,800 staff.

Founded
1986
Headquarters
Gatwick, West Sussex, United Kingdom
Employees
~2,779
Annual revenue
£1,132.1M (FY2025)
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.