Construction / Real Estate

Grainger sustainability score: 55/100

55/100
Making progress
Joint 5th of 53 in Construction / Real Estate

Better than 90% of Construction / Real Estate

Leading practice starts at 60. The highest score on SINK is 71.

Limited independent evidence: only two independent sources cover this company. The score may change as more evidence appears.

Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)

Buying from companies like this? Check 5 of your suppliers free

About Grainger

Grainger is a London-listed UK residential landlord, owning and running build-to-rent apartment blocks and other private rented homes, based in Newcastle upon Tyne. It reported £262.7 million of group revenue for the year to 30 September 2025, with about 370 employees.

Founded 1912Head office Newcastle upon Tyne, United KingdomStaff ~370 (2025)Revenue £262.7 million Group revenue (year ended 30 September 2025; 2024: £290.1 million)Website ↗

Read Grainger's own report ↗

Our verdict

Grainger reports verified Scope 1 and 2 emissions and a full Scope 3 inventory, including the embodied carbon of its new buildings and its tenants' energy, and has SBTi-validated targets. But its embodied carbon is estimated from spend, only 32% of tenant energy comes from meter readings, its Scope 3 target is intensity-based, and its renewable electricity is tariff-based without additionality.

Grainger scores 55/100 (Making progress) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it. Last verified November 2026.

That places Grainger joint 63rd of 1,118 companies scored, and joint 5th of 53 in Construction / Real Estate.

The ten questions

What is Grainger doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Carbon Footprint: Operations and Transparency & Accountability (8/10, 8/10). Weakest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Resource Use & Waste (4/10, 4/10).

What's missing

Where Grainger lost points

For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.

What would raise this score

  • Its effect on natureMeasure its effect on nature and have it independently verified.
  • How it uses materials and handles wasteReport measurable waste or recycling targets publicly.
  • Its effect on waterMeasure its water footprint and set reduction targets.

Every question that lost points

  • Emissions from its own operations8/10No verified figures published with their method and a falling trend.
  • Emissions from its supply chain7/10No full value-chain map or supplier engagement programme.
  • Whether its emissions are falling7/10No consistent fall over several years across its operations and supply chain.
  • How clean its energy is6/10Less than 90% of its energy shown to be renewable.
  • Its effect on nature4/10Its effect on nature isn't measured or independently verified.
  • How it uses materials and handles waste4/10No measurable waste or recycling targets reported publicly.
  • Its effect on water5/10No measured water footprint with reduction targets.
  • Its climate targets7/10No validated long-term net zero target.
  • How openly it reports8/10No mission-locked structure, such as B Corp certification.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.

The calculation

How is Grainger's SINK score calculated?

Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.

SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale
Industry base impact
Construction / Real Estate sector ceiling.
35 / 100
Performance score
Sum of the ten questions, each scored 0 to 10.
64 / 100
Raw score
Weighted average before scale penalty.
(0.3 × 35) + (0.7 × 64) = 55.3
Scale penalty
Multiplier based on total emissions. Bigger polluters lose more.
× 1
Final score
Rounded. Making progress.
55 / 100
Where the evidence comes from

What evidence is Grainger's score based on?

11 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.

55% of them were published by Grainger itself; the rest come from independent sources.

Grainger prints its FY25 Scope 1 (207 tCO2e), market-based Scope 2 (83 tCO2e) and Scope 3 (54,042 tCO2e) separately; the total shown is their sum.

[1]Self-reported
Grainger plc Annual Report and Accounts 2025

“of our BTR properties now rated EPC A to”

2025
Q9
View →
[2]Third-party verified
Grainger plc FY25 GHG Emissions Verification Statement

“A limited level of verification was conducted, aligned with the ISO 14064-3:2019 standard”

2025
Q1Q2
View →
[3]Self-reported
Grainger plc iXBRL Filing (FY2025)

“T otal footp rint 1,796 1,455 -19% 514 290 -44%”

2025
Q1Q2Q3Q9
View →
[4]Self-reported
Grainger EPRA and SASB Sustainability Performance Measures 2025

“Grainger has a target to procure 100% renewable electricity and 100% green gas for our directly purchased energy.”

2025
Q4Q6Q7
View →
[5]Self-reported
Grainger Net Zero Carbon Pathway 2025

“We intend to only use offsetting as a last resort where”

2025
Q4Q6Q8
View →
[6]Self-reported
CDP Response in 2025

“Grainger undertakes biodiversity assessments for development sites. These include detailed assessments by”

2025
Q5Q9
View →
[7]Self-reported
Environmental Policy 2026

“We will protect and enhance biodiversity for the benefit of the environment,”

2026
Q5
View →
[8]Independent source
WorldGBC Net Zero Carbon Buildings Commitment — Grainger plc

“Grainger is the UK’s largest listed residential landlord in the Private Rented Sector (PRS).”

Ongoing
Q8
View →
[9]Public record
London Fire Brigade Public Notice — Ability Plaza, Hackney

“ABILITY PLAZA, 1A ARBUTUS STREET, HACKNEY, LONDON, E8 4DT”

2024
Q10
View →
[10]
cityam.com

“provision to fix historic fire safety defects”

Q10
View →
[11]
building.co.uk

“Gordon has re-positioned Grainger as a “pureplay” build-to-rent provider”

Q10
View →

If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.

For Grainger

Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)

Free. Once you confirm, this page says “Profile claimed by Grainger” and we email you when the score changes. Claiming changes nothing about the score. More than one person can claim a company. Privacy

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Send new evidence, free

    Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.

    How to send evidence →
  • Put your score on your website, free

    It shows the current band, sector rank and score, and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.

    Grainger: SINK sustainability score 55.

Track this score

We'll send one email to confirm. Every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy

Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →

We reply within 5 working days.

Want your own page like this?

Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.

Score my business free
Grainger in context

How does Grainger compare with other construction / real estate companies?

Where Grainger sits among construction / real estate peers.

Among the 53 major construction / real estate brands we've scored, Grainger is tied =5th of 53, with 1 other.

=5/53
Grainger's rank
42
Industry average
19
Industry low
60
Industry high
See all 53 in Construction / Real Estate →
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

Find your page and claim it, free →

Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it.