Manchester Metropolitan University scores 60/100 (Leading practice) on SINK's independent climate assessment — scored from public data only, no company payment can change a number. Last verified September 2026.
That places Manchester Metropolitan University joint 14th of 780 companies scored, and 1st of 66 in Higher Education / Universities.
Manchester Met has cut Scope 1+2 emissions 65% since 2005 and publishes audited sustainability data annually. The Ryebank Fields controversy — selling a 10-acre rewilded site to developers while promoting biodiversity campaigns — exposes a material gap between stated values and land-use decisions. Scope 3 reduction trajectory remains weak with only one year of verified data.
This score is built from public data only. If your practice is stronger than your disclosure, submit evidence for review — or challenge any question, free.
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Transparency & Accountability (8/10, 8/10). Weakest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Controversies & Red Flags (5/10, 6/10).
12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
6 of 12 sources are third-party verified or public record.
“Total scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions: 7720.9 tCO2e (HESA Table-3, 2023/24, UKPRN 10004180)”
“NQA applied a limited level of assurance, designed to confirm that the data and information presented are accurate, reliable, and comparable.”
“Total scope 3: 81,814 tCO2e (2022/23); prior year 85,746 tCO2e”
“Scope 3 emissions accounted for 92% of the University's total CO2e in the reporting year”
“In 2023/24 the University had reduced its scope 1 and 2 emissions by 32.1%, moving the university closer towards its near-term reduction target of 44% by 2025/26.”
“Suppliers are expected to demonstrate robust environmental management practices at the tender stage, including recognised certifications such as ISO 14001 and ISO 50001.”
“certified to the internationally recognised standard ISO 14001:2015 for our Environmental Management System and are certified for the period 2025 - 2028”
“MMU, which ranks as the seventh best University for Biological Sciences in the UK, plans to sell the land to its preferred developers”
“It's a case of the university saying the right thing, doing the wrong thing”
“Manchester Metropolitan University (MMU) has been accused of 'pure hypocrisy' in a row over its plans to sell Ryebank Fields”
“Leading the way — that's how we've ranked Manchester Metropolitan University on its plan to reduce emissions and fight climate change.”
“The Sustainability Policy and Leadership in Sustainability Strategy will be implemented through the University's environmental management system which is certified to ISO 14001.”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Manchester Metropolitan University is the highest-scoring higher education / universities company we've rated.
Among the 66 major higher education / universities brands we've scored, Manchester Metropolitan University sits 1st of 66.
As Manchester Metropolitan University's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
This score is not currently being contested.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Manchester Metropolitan University is a public research and teaching institution in Manchester, UK, teaching across six faculties. It is a major employer and urban stakeholder in Greater Manchester's knowledge economy and sustainability commitments.
Peer higher education institution; UK research-intensive sector comparator for emissions and governance frameworks
View breakdown →UK post-1992 university with comparable student body size and regional sustainability commitments
View breakdown →UK teaching-focused institution; peer cohort for waste management and resource efficiency reporting
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Been scored?
See what's behind your number →Nobody can pay us to change a number.