Packaging

Mondi sustainability score: 42/100

42/100
Below expectations
3rd of 4 in Packaging

Making progress starts at 46. The highest score on SINK is 71.

Limited independent evidence: only two independent sources cover this company. The score may change as more evidence appears.

Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)

About Mondi

Mondi makes paper and packaging from wood fibre, from containerboard, boxes and office paper to kraft paper, paper bags and consumer packaging. In 2025 its Corrugated Packaging business had €3,775 million of revenue and its Flexible Packaging business €3,941 million.

More about Mondi

Mondi plc was incorporated in 2007 under the name Hackplimco No.119 plc. It had an average of about 22,100 full-time equivalent employees and €7,663 million revenue in 2025.

Founded 2007Head office Weybridge, United KingdomStaff ~22,100 average full-time equivalent (2025; reported as 22.1 thousand)Revenue ~€7.66B revenue (€7,663M, 2025)Website ↗

Read Mondi's own report ↗

Our verdict

Mondi's footprint was 7.41 million tCO2e in 2025 across all three scopes, up from 4.58 million t in 2024 after acquisitions and a fuller supply-chain count. 77% of its energy was renewable, mostly biomass burned at its mills, but it still uses gas and coal. Its SBTi-validated targets are absolute: Scope 1 and 2 down 46.2% by 2030 from 2019, and net zero by 2050; the 2030 Scope 3 target covers about two-thirds of Scope 3. Its Scope 1 and 2 figures have reasonable outside assurance, but its water use per tonne is rising. In 2025 it reported 116 minor breaches of environmental limits and a fine under €6,000, and LobbyMap notes it has not reviewed its industry groups' climate lobbying.

Mondi scores 42/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it. Last verified November 2026.

That places Mondi joint 370th of 1,043 companies scored, and 3rd of 4 in Packaging.

The ten questions

What is Mondi doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Targets & Commitments and Carbon Footprint: Operations (9/10, 8/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Water Impact (0/10, 5/10).

What's missing

Where Mondi lost points

For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.

What would raise this score

  • Whether its emissions are fallingShow its emissions are falling.
  • Its effect on waterMeasure its water footprint and set reduction targets.
  • How clean its energy isShow at least 90% of its energy is renewable.

Every question that lost points

  • Emissions from its own operations8/10No verified figures published with their method and a falling trend.
  • Emissions from its supply chain7/10No full value-chain map or supplier engagement programme.
  • Whether its emissions are falling0/10No evidence its emissions are falling.
  • How clean its energy is6/10Less than 90% of its energy shown to be renewable.
  • Its effect on nature6/10No verified restoration beyond its own footprint, or supply chain not mapped for nature risk.
  • How it uses materials and handles waste6/10No verified figures for reuse and recycling across the business.
  • Its effect on water5/10No measured water footprint with reduction targets.
  • Its climate targets9/10No validated long-term net zero target.
  • How openly it reports8/10No mission-locked structure, such as B Corp certification.
  • Its record on controversies6/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.

The calculation

How is Mondi's SINK score calculated?

Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.

SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale
Industry base impact
Packaging sector ceiling.
30 / 100
Performance score
Sum of the ten questions, each scored 0 to 10.
61 / 100
Raw score
Weighted average before scale penalty.
(0.3 × 30) + (0.7 × 61) = 51.7
Scale penalty
Multiplier based on total emissions. Bigger polluters lose more.
× 0.82
Final score
Rounded. Below expectations.
42 / 100
Where the evidence comes from

What evidence is Mondi's score based on?

10 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.

50% of them were published by Mondi itself; the rest come from independent sources.

[1]Self-reported
Mondi Group Sustainable Development Report 2025

“reasonable assurance on our Scope 1 and 2”

2025
Q1Q2Q6Q7Q9
View →
[2]Self-reported
Mondi Action Plan 2030 — Taking Action on Climate

“Compared to last year , our Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions increased”

Ongoing
Q1Q2Q3Q4Q5Q7
View →
[3]Self-reported
Mondi MAP2030 Performance 2025

“Maintain zero deforestation in our wood supply,”

2025
Q5Q8
View →
[4]Self-reported
Mondi retains its net-zero commitment (News and Insight)

“The revised baseline includes the acquisitions of Duino”

2025
Q8
View →
[5]Independent source
Mondi has Science-Based Targets approved on road to net-zero by 2050

“have been approved by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) as consistent with the 1.5C limit of the Paris Agreement”

Unknown
Q8
View →
[6]Self-reported
Mondis leading sustainability practice recognised again with CDP A-List Rating

“annual A List for the seventh consecutive year”

2025
Q9
View →
[7]Independent source
Mondi Final Results (Investegate)

“Group revenue of €7,663 million was up on the prior year”

Unknown
Q9
View →
[8]Independent source
Mondi — LobbyMap Profile (InfluenceMap)

“Mondi is a member of two industry associations that are actively engaged on climate policy, the Confederation of European Paper Industries (CEPI)”

Ongoing
Q10
View →
[9]Independent source
Merebank's Apartheid Environmental Woes Escalate Exponentially (Daily Maverick)

“heavily polluting industries in the South Durban Basin”

2023
Q10
View →
[10]Independent source
The Good Shopping Guide — Mondi

“the company receives a poor rating for fossil fuels”

Unknown
Q4Q10
View →

If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.

For Mondi

Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)

Free. Once you confirm, this page says “Profile claimed by Mondi” and we email you when the score changes. Claiming changes nothing about the score. More than one person can claim a company. Privacy

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Send new evidence, free

    Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.

    How to send evidence →
  • Put your score on your website, free

    It shows the current band, sector rank and score, and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.

    Mondi: SINK sustainability score 42.

Track this score

We'll send one email to confirm. Every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy

Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →

We reply within 5 working days.

Want your own page like this?

Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.

Score my business free
Mondi in context

How does Mondi compare with other packaging companies?

Where Mondi sits among packaging peers.

Among the 4 major packaging brands we've scored, Mondi sits 3rd of 4.

3/4
Mondi's rank
45
Industry average
41
Industry low
49
Industry high
See all 4 in Packaging →
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

Find your page and claim it, free →

Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it.