Persimmon reports emissions data and has SBTi-validated near-term targets, but Scope 3 relies on intensity metrics as output recovers, weakening real reduction claims. River pollution prosecution, fire safety failures, and an ongoing CMA anti-competitive investigation expose systemic governance gaps beneath sustainability rhetoric.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (7/10, 6/10). Weakest on Controversies & Red Flags and Water Impact (2/10, 2/10).
12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 12 major construction / real estate brands we've scored, Persimmon is tied =7th of 12, with 1 other.
Score history begins 4 April 2026.
As Persimmon's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Persimmon is the UK's largest housebuilder by volume, founded in 1972 and headquartered in York. The company builds new residential developments across England, Wales, and Scotland, delivering approximately 10,600 homes annually. It operates vertically integrated subsidiaries including timber frame manufacturing, brick production, and tile works.
Direct UK housebuilder peer facing identical fire safety legacy and output-intensity carbon target trade-offs.
View breakdown →Largest UK housebuilder rival; comparable scale, supply chain emissions dominance, and regulatory scrutiny.
View breakdown →Global developer and builder with vertical integration; contrasts integrated circular economy claims against greenfield land use impact.
View breakdown →Nordic construction group with stronger environmental reporting standards; benchmarks transparency gap in UK housebuilding sector.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.