Construction / Real Estate·London, United Kingdom·Founded 2007

Taylor Wimpey sustainability score: 42/100

Taylor Wimpey is a FTSE 100 housebuilder founded in 2007, headquartered in London.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

Pending reviewMixed evidence· 8 src

Taylor Wimpey has strong climate targets (SBTi-validated, net zero by 2045) and operational carbon reporting, but supply chain emissions remain 99% of its footprint with only modest reductions. A £488k water pollution fine for reckless failures, lobbying against stronger building standards, and ongoing CMA investigation undermine credibility. Volume-dependent emissions gains mask real progress.

Taylor Wimpey scores 42/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified May 2026.

That places Taylor Wimpey joint 317th of 847 companies scored, and joint 13th of 26 in Construction / Real Estate.

At a glance

Taylor Wimpey's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Emissions from its own operations8/10
  • Its climate targets8/10
Weakest
  • Its effect on water3/10
  • Its record on controversies4/10
See all ten questions ↓
Taylor Wimpey in context

How does Taylor Wimpey compare with other construction / real estate companies?

Where Taylor Wimpey sits among construction / real estate peers.

Among the 26 major construction / real estate brands we've scored, Taylor Wimpey is tied =13th of 26, with 1 other.

=13/26
Taylor Wimpey's rank
41
Industry average
27
Industry low
60
Industry high
See all 26 in Construction / Real Estate →
What would raise this score

Where Taylor Wimpey lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Its effect on water3/10

    Judge found Taylor Wimpey 'recklessly failed' to implement mitigations despite NRW warnings.

  2. Its record on controversies4/10

    Greenpeace investigation (2021) revealed lobbying against Future Homes Standard, calling 75-80% carbon targets 'too ambitious'—among only 2-3% of respondents opposed.

  3. Whether its emissions are falling5/10

    However, completions were a third lower in 2024 than 2019, inflating apparent progress.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For Taylor Wimpey

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is Taylor Wimpey doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Targets & Commitments (8/10, 8/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Controversies & Red Flags (3/10, 4/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 8 sources.

About Taylor Wimpey

Taylor Wimpey is a FTSE 100 housebuilder founded in 2007, headquartered in London. It develops residential properties across the UK and Spain. The company is the second-largest housebuilder in the UK by volume and a major player in the construction sector, with operations spanning land acquisition, design, build, and sales.

Founded
2007
Headquarters
London, United Kingdom
Employees
~4,700
Annual revenue
~£3.4B
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.