Construction / Real Estate·Prague, Czech Republic·Founded 2001

Skanska AB sustainability score: 44/100

Skanska AB is a multinational construction and real estate development company operating across multiple markets with operations in commercial, residential, and infrastructure sectors.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

Pending reviewStrong evidence· 13 src

Skanska demonstrates strong absolute emissions reductions—61% Scope 1+2, 37% Scope 3—with SBTi-validated targets and ahead-of-schedule progress. Critical weaknesses: nature and biodiversity impact remain largely unmeasured at group level, water consumption targets absent, and Scope 3 coverage captures only 1 of 15 GHG Protocol categories.

Skanska AB scores 44/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified May 2026.

That places Skanska AB joint 278th of 847 companies scored, and 11th of 26 in Construction / Real Estate.

At a glance

Skanska AB's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Emissions from its own operations8/10
  • Its climate targets8/10
Weakest
  • Its effect on nature3/10
  • Its effect on water3/10
See all ten questions ↓
Skanska AB in context

How does Skanska AB compare with other construction / real estate companies?

Where Skanska AB sits among construction / real estate peers.

Among the 26 major construction / real estate brands we've scored, Skanska AB sits 11th of 26.

11/26
Skanska AB's rank
41
Industry average
27
Industry low
60
Industry high
See all 26 in Construction / Real Estate →
What would raise this score

Where Skanska AB lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Its effect on nature3/10

    No group-level biodiversity impact assessment, supply chain nature impact, or ecosystem conversion avoidance disclosed.

  2. Its effect on water3/10

    However, no group-wide quantified water consumption data, reduction targets, or water footprint assessment disclosed.

  3. How it uses materials and handles waste5/10

    Skanska reports waste with limited external assurance and states focus on reusing and recycling materials.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For Skanska AB

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is Skanska AB doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Targets & Commitments (8/10, 8/10). Weakest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Water Impact (3/10, 3/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 13 sources.

About Skanska AB

Skanska AB is a multinational construction and real estate development company operating across multiple markets with operations in commercial, residential, and infrastructure sectors. The company is one of Europe's largest listed construction firms, with significant presence in project development, project management, and construction services.

Founded
2001
Headquarters
Prague, Czech Republic
Employees
~27,000
Annual revenue
~$17.3B (SEK 177.2B)
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.