Karma Kitchen sustainability score: 33/100
Karma Kitchen is a UK dark kitchen operator that builds and manages shared commercial kitchen spaces for food delivery brands across London. Founded around 2018, the company operates modular kitchen facilities with built-in waste management systems, serving as infrastructure for the ghost restaurant market.
Founded 2015Head office London, GBStaff ~27Revenue Not disclosed (private startup)Website ↗
Karma Kitchen operates six-to-eight London dark kitchen sites with a small 27-person team. The company makes unsubstantiated claims about renewable energy and Net Zero by 2030 but publishes zero emissions data, no sustainability report, and no verified targets. Growth is outpacing any decarbonisation planning.
Karma Kitchen scores 33/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score. Last verified May 2026.
That places Karma Kitchen joint 595th of 934 companies scored, and 20th of 27 in Construction / Real Estate.
What is Karma Kitchen doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Resource Use & Waste (8/10, 5/10). Weakest on Carbon Footprint: Supply Chain and Emissions Trajectory (2/10, 2/10).
Where Karma Kitchen lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
- Emissions from its own operations3/10No emissions figures for its own operations, not even an estimate from energy bills.
- Emissions from its supply chain2/10No assessment of where its supply-chain emissions come from.
- Whether its emissions are falling2/10No evidence its emissions are falling, not even from energy bills or mileage.
- How clean its energy is4/10Less than half its energy shown to be renewable, or no transition plan.
- Its effect on nature2/10No assessment of its effect on nature, and no basic environmental policy.
- How it uses materials and handles waste5/10No measurable waste or recycling targets reported publicly.
- Its effect on water2/10No monitoring of water use, or no measures to reduce it.
- Its climate targets2/10No specific targets with dates.
- How openly it reports2/10No published sustainability data, or no one named as responsible for it.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is Karma Kitchen's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleWhat evidence is Karma Kitchen's score based on?
8 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
50% of them were published by Karma Kitchen itself; the rest come from independent sources.
Scored on 5 April 2026 under an earlier version of our method. We're re-checking it under the current method.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current score and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does Karma Kitchen compare with other construction / real estate companies?
Where Karma Kitchen sits among construction / real estate peers.
Among the 27 major construction / real estate brands we've scored, Karma Kitchen sits 20th of 27.
Who scores higher in Construction / Real Estate?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Karma Kitchen.
Persimmon's operational emissions fell steeply, but Scope 3 rose year-on-year as production grew.
See the breakdown →SEGRO reports comprehensive GHG data with external assurance and SBTi validation, but relies entirely on intensity-based targets masking absolute emissions growth across its expanding European data centre and logistics portfolio.
See the breakdown →The Crown Estate reports rising absolute emissions driven by offshore wind construction on leased seabed, with Scope 3 up 60% year-on-year.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score.