Carbon Footprint — Operations: How does Innocent Drinks score?

DitchCarbon reports Innocent's 2022 Scope 1 at 542 tonnes CO₂e and Scope 2 at zero (attributed to renewable energy procurement). The data is cascaded from parent Coca-Cola's reporting framework and aligned with GHG Protocol methodology via SBTi. However, Innocent does not publish a standalone verified emissions report with granular operational breakdown. The Blender factory in Rotterdam is all-electric and runs on renewable energy, which explains the near-zero operational footprint.

Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain: How does Innocent Drinks score?

Scope 3 emissions are quantified at approximately 227,604 tonnes CO₂e (2022), with purchased goods and services (ingredients) representing nearly all of the Scope 3 footprint. Innocent has identified that over 50% of its carbon footprint comes from ingredients. The company has engaged SE Advisory Services to calculate its supply chain footprint, identified hotspots, and launched the £1m Farmer Innovation Fund to address supply chain emissions through regenerative farming. A supplier engagement p

Emissions Trajectory: How does Innocent Drinks score?

Total emissions fell from approximately 275,000 tonnes in 2019 to 228,146 tonnes in 2022, suggesting progress. However, DitchCarbon reports that Scope 3 emissions increased by 3% in the most recent year. Critically, Innocent's SBTi-validated Scope 3 target is intensity-based (50% reduction per litre of finished product by 2030), not absolute. With the company growing revenue by 13.2% in 2024 and expanding production through The Blender, absolute Scope 3 could continue rising even as intensity fa

Energy Source: How does Innocent Drinks score?

The Blender factory in Rotterdam is all-electric and powered by renewable energy with on-site solar panels. Innocent states that its offices run on 100% renewable energy and more than 80% of its drinks are blended and bottled in factories using renewable electricity. Electric juice tankers operate at the new factory, and the company is transitioning its vehicle fleet to electric. Not yet 100% across all operations and third-party factories, and supplier energy transition is still in progress, pr

Nature & Biodiversity Impact: How does Innocent Drinks score?

Innocent has invested in biodiversity through its Farmer Innovation Fund (£1m in 2024), supporting regenerative farming projects including cover cropping, low-till farming, and bee hotel installations at apple orchards. By 2019, 75% of ingredients were verified as responsibly sourced through SAI-FSA. However, a link to unsustainable water use threatening Doñana National Park through a Spanish strawberry supplier is a significant nature risk. No formal TNFD-aligned disclosure or quantified nature

Resource Use & Waste: How does Innocent Drinks score?

Innocent is a founding member of the UK Plastics Pact and a signatory to the Ellen MacArthur Foundation's Global Commitment. Bottles contain 50% rPET, with a target of 100% renewable or recycled packaging by 2030. The company has lightweighted bottles, switched to paper straws, and advocated for deposit return schemes. However, it still uses significant virgin plastic, has acknowledged that zero-virgin-plastic bottles by 2022 was unrealistic, and continues to rely on single-use packaging. Measur

Water Impact: How does Innocent Drinks score?

Innocent has done notable water work in its supply chain, particularly in Spain where the Irri-Fresa app helped strawberry farmers reduce water use by up to 40% (saving 1.7 billion litres in 2015). The Blender factory incorporates water efficiency innovations. However, one of Innocent's suppliers was linked to unsustainable water use threatening Doñana National Park, a UNESCO World Heritage wetland. No comprehensive, quantified organisational water footprint with reduction targets has been publi

Targets & Commitments: How does Innocent Drinks score?

Innocent has SBTi-validated near-term targets: 100% reduction in Scope 1 and 2 by 2030, and 50% reduction in Scope 3 per litre of finished product by 2030. Net zero across the entire value chain is targeted by 2040. These are credible, science-aligned commitments. However, the Scope 3 target is intensity-based rather than absolute, which is a significant limitation for a growing company. The company uses some offsets for residual gas use in offices. Reduction-first approach is evident through fa

Transparency & Accountability: How does Innocent Drinks score?

Innocent is a certified B Corp with a score of 105.2, has published a 'Good all round' sustainability report, publicly discloses the carbon footprint of each drink, and has a Head of Sustainability. The company has SBTi-validated targets and reports emissions via the Coca-Cola corporate family framework. However, there is no recent standalone annual sustainability report with comprehensive data readily available (the 'Good all round' report was a first in 2020). Board-level sustainability govern

Controversies & Red Flags: How does Innocent Drinks score?

Starting at 8: The ASA ruled in February 2022 that Innocent's 'Little Drinks, Big Dreams' ad was misleading for implying that purchasing products had a positive environmental impact (upheld regulatory action, -2). Innocent is over 90% owned by Coca-Cola, consistently ranked among the world's top plastic polluters, which raises questions about structural alignment (-1). A supplier was linked to unsustainable water extraction threatening Doñana National Park. No evidence of direct anti-climate lob

Innocent Drinks Sustainability Score: 51/100

Recently scored: Dentsu, Omnicom, Publicis Groupe, WPP

507 companies scored·4 score updates this week

Innocent Drinks·Food & Beverage (non-meat)·Southampton, United Kingdom·Founded 1999·Last verified 21 April 2026

out of 100

Making progressPending Review-2 since last review

Innocent has credible science-aligned climate targets and meaningful supply chain investment through its Farmer Innovation Fund, but relies on intensity-based rather than absolute emission reductions for Scope 3, risking continued absolute growth. The ASA ruled its environmental claims misleading in 2022. Coca-Cola ownership raises structural alignment questions.

No challenges currently filed

The calculation

Every score shows its working.

Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.

SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale

Industry base impact

Food & Beverage (non-meat) sector ceiling.

50 / 100

Performance score

Sum of the 10 rubric questions, scored 0–10 each.

55 / 100

Raw score

Weighted average before scale penalty.

(0.3 × 50) + (0.7 × 55) = 53.5

Scale penalty

Multiplier based on absolute emissions volume — physics-first.

× 0.95

Final score

Rounded. Making progress.

51 / 100

The ten questions

Where Innocent Drinks is strong, and where it isn't.

Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain and Energy Source (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Emissions Trajectory (4/10, 4/10).

Where the evidence comes from

Every document used, listed.

16 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.

[1]Third-party verified

DitchCarbon: Innocent Drinks Organization Profile

Ongoing

Q1Q2Q3Q9

Every score shows its working.

Where Innocent Drinks is strong, and where it isn't.

Every document used, listed.

Where Innocent Drinks sits among food & beverage (non-meat) peers.

Innocent Drinks's score over time.

This score is not currently being contested.

Related companies worth a look.

We'll let you know when the score moves.

Which companies moved this week, and why.