Red Bull scores 32/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment — scored from public data only, no company payment can change a number. Last verified May 2026.
That places Red Bull joint 399th of 596 companies scored, and joint 39th of 42 in Food & Beverage (non-meat).
Red Bull has no quantified emissions data, no supply chain transparency, and growing production volumes with zero evidence of absolute emissions decline. Its claims on renewable energy (80%) and aluminium recycling lack verification. A 2025 water controversy in Germany and documented litter problems expose operational and end-of-life weaknesses.
This score is built from public data only. If your practice is stronger than your disclosure, submit evidence for review — or challenge any question, free.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Resource Use & Waste (6/10, 4/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (1/10, 1/10).
8 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Where Red Bull sits among food & beverage (non-meat) peers.
Among the 42 major food & beverage (non-meat) brands we've scored, Red Bull is tied =39th of 42, with 1 other.
Score history begins 11 April 2026.
As Red Bull's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
This score is not currently being contested.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Red Bull GmbH is an Austrian-headquartered beverage company founded in 1987, now operating globally with ~€11.2B revenue and 20,000 employees. It manufactures energy drinks in 178 countries, with a supply chain spanning aluminium procurement, sugar sourcing, and Formula 1 motorsport sponsorship. The company is privately held.
Peer beverage giant with similar aluminium packaging footprint and litter profile; often cited as comparison for corporate circularity claims.
View breakdown →Direct competitor in energy drink category; comparable supply chain complexity, private-hold structure, and limited sustainability disclosure.
View breakdown →Large multinational with similar claims-to-data gap on renewable energy and unverified recycling content assertions.
View breakdown →Privately-influenced conglomerate that publishes formal ESG reports; illustrates transparency standard Red Bull does not meet.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.