Food & Beverage (non-meat)·Burton Latimer, United Kingdom·Founded 1932

Weetabix Food Company sustainability score: 52/100

Weetabix Food Company manufactures breakfast cereals and grain-based foods.

Is this your business? Add your evidence →

Pending reviewMixed evidence· 11 src

Weetabix has delivered genuine Scope 1 and 2 reductions (20.54% absolute by end-2024) and secured SBTi validation of near-term and net-zero targets. Dominant weaknesses: Scope 3 absolute figures remain undisclosed despite wheat representing 37% of footprint; no TNFD biodiversity disclosure; incomplete public transparency on carbon baselines and water consumption figures.

Weetabix Food Company scores 52/100 (Making progress) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Fees pay for the review, never the result. Last verified May 2026.

That places Weetabix Food Company joint 105th of 847 companies scored, and joint 7th of 46 in Food & Beverage (non-meat).

At a glance

Weetabix Food Company's strongest and weakest areas

Strongest
  • Its climate targets7/10
  • Its record on controversies7/10
Weakest
  • Emissions from its supply chain4/10
  • Its effect on nature5/10
See all ten questions ↓
Weetabix Food Company in context

How does Weetabix Food Company compare with other food & beverage (non-meat) companies?

Where Weetabix Food Company sits among food & beverage (non-meat) peers.

Among the 46 major food & beverage (non-meat) brands we've scored, Weetabix Food Company is tied =7th of 46, with 1 other.

=7/46
Weetabix Food Company's rank
43
Industry average
19
Industry low
57
Industry high
See all 46 in Food & Beverage (non-meat) →
What would raise this score

Where Weetabix Food Company lost the most points

Its three lowest-scoring questions, and what the evidence didn't show.

  1. Emissions from its supply chain4/10

    Absolute Scope 3 figures in tonnes CO2e not publicly disclosed.

  2. Its effect on nature5/10

    No TNFD disclosure; no quantified biodiversity footprint or deforestation-free commitment.

  3. Its effect on water5/10

    No significant pollution incidents evidenced.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Evidence that isn't public can count through an evidence review.

For Weetabix Food Company

Is this your company?

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Add your evidence, £99

    Scored low because little is published? Send us your evidence. A person reviews it and your score reflects what you really do. Done within 5 working days.

    Evidence review →
  • Go tender-ready, £495 a year

    A yearly rescore, a check of up to 25 key suppliers and a score badge for your website (coming soon).

    Get in touch →
Fees pay for the review, never the result.
The ten questions

What is Weetabix Food Company doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Targets & Commitments and Controversies & Red Flags (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (4/10, 5/10).

Method and evidence

How we worked this out

The formula and all 11 sources.

About Weetabix Food Company

Weetabix Food Company manufactures breakfast cereals and grain-based foods. Founded 1932, headquartered in Burton Latimer, UK. A subsidiary of US-listed Post Holdings, Weetabix sources 100% of its primary ingredient (wheat) from British farms within 50 miles of its factory, positioning it as a domestically focused food manufacturer in the packaged cereals and grains segment.

Founded
1932
Headquarters
Burton Latimer, United Kingdom
Employees
~1,028
Annual revenue
~£361M
Company website ↗
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

See what's behind your number →

Fees pay for the review, never the result.