Ferrero sustainability score: 44/100
Ferrero is a Luxembourg-based confectionery and food manufacturer with €19.3bn revenue and 48,697 employees. It produces chocolate, hazelnut spreads, and packaged foods globally, owning brands including Nutella, Ferrero Rocher, and Tic Tac.
More about Ferrero
Founded in 1946, it is one of the world's largest cocoa and palm oil buyers.
Founded 1946Head office LuxembourgStaff ~48,697 (2025)Revenue €19.3B (FY2025)Website ↗
Ferrero has made genuine progress on operational emissions (21.7% Scope 1&2 reduction) and renewable energy (90% globally), but Scope 3—where most emissions live—is tracked only by intensity, not absolute cuts. Supply chain deforestation risk persists despite 'deforestation-free' claims. Child labour in hazelnuts and greenwashing criticism undermine credibility.
Ferrero scores 44/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score. Last verified May 2026.
That places Ferrero joint 306th of 934 companies scored, and joint 18th of 51 in Food & Beverage (non-meat).
What is Ferrero doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Energy Source and Carbon Footprint: Operations (7/10, 6/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Carbon Footprint: Supply Chain (4/10, 5/10).
Where Ferrero lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
- Emissions from its own operations6/10Its own emissions aren't independently verified or tracked over several years.
- Emissions from its supply chain5/10Most of its supply-chain (Scope 3) emissions aren't measured.
- Whether its emissions are falling5/10No evidence of a year-on-year fall in its total emissions.
- How clean its energy is7/10Less than 90% of its energy shown to be renewable.
- Its effect on nature5/10Its effect on nature isn't measured or independently verified.
- How it uses materials and handles waste5/10No measurable waste or recycling targets reported publicly.
- Its effect on water4/10No measured water footprint with reduction targets.
- Its climate targets6/10Its targets aren't validated by the Science Based Targets initiative.
- How openly it reports6/10No annual impact report, or no pay linked to climate targets.
- Its record on controversies6/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is Ferrero's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleWhat evidence is Ferrero's score based on?
13 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
31% of them were published by Ferrero itself; the rest come from independent sources.
Scored on 11 April 2026 under an earlier version of our method. We're re-checking it under the current method.
9 of 13 sources are independent of the company.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current score and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does Ferrero compare with other food & beverage (non-meat) companies?
Where Ferrero sits among food & beverage (non-meat) peers.
Among the 51 major food & beverage (non-meat) brands we've scored, Ferrero is tied =18th of 51, with 7 others.
Who scores higher in Food & Beverage (non-meat)?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Ferrero.
Carlsberg reports thorough, assured emissions data, but its reported total rose 9% in 2025 to 9.0 MtCO2e after the Britvic deal, and most of its renewable electricity comes from unbundled certificates.
See the breakdown →Kerry has cut its own emissions 52% since 2017 and has SBTi-validated targets for net zero by 2049, but most of the fall in its total, to 7.1 MtCO2e, came from selling its dairy business.
See the breakdown →Candy Kittens has calculated its carbon footprint via ClimatePartner but publishes no emissions figures or reduction targets.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score.