Mondelēz has credible emissions reporting and SBTi-validated 1.5°C targets, but operational Scope 1 emissions rose 12.3% in 2024, undermining absolute reduction claims. Nature exposure through cocoa and palm is poorly managed—Rainforest Action Network gave them an F for weak deforestation enforcement. Unresolved controversies include EU antitrust fines, Russian operations, and undisclosed trade association lobbying.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Targets & Commitments and Carbon Footprint — Operations (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Controversies & Red Flags and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (4/10, 4/10).
18 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 41 major fmcg / consumer goods brands we've scored, Mondelēz International, Inc. sits 26th of 41.
Score history begins 8 February 2026.
As Mondelēz International, Inc.'s score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Mondelēz International is a US-based FMCG company manufacturing snacks, confectionery, and baked goods across 150+ countries. Founded in 2012 and headquartered in Chicago, it is the world's largest publicly traded snacking company by revenue, with brands including Oreo, Cadbury, Doritos, and Trident. It operates a complex global supply chain dependent on cocoa, dairy, and palm oil.
Peer FMCG conglomerate with similar cocoa supply chain deforestation exposure and lobbying risks
View breakdown →Comparable multinational FMCG with palm oil dependencies, stronger NDPE enforcement, and similar trade association transparency gaps
View breakdown →Peer snacking and packaged food manufacturer facing similar virgin plastic trajectory and circular economy challenges
View breakdown →FMCG competitor with more advanced renewable energy transition and stronger deforestation commitment enforcement
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.