The Clorox Company sustainability score: 41/100
The Clorox Company manufactures and sells cleaning products, disinfectants, and related consumer goods across 25 countries. Founded in 1913 and headquartered in Oakland, California, it is a major FMCG player in home and institutional cleaning, with brands including Clorox bleach, Glad bags, Kingsford charcoal, and Hidden Valley dressings.
Founded 1913Head office Oakland, CaliforniaStaff ~8,000Revenue ~$7.1BWebsite ↗
Clorox has achieved notable operational emissions reductions and renewable electricity for US/Canada operations, but Scope 3 gains are primarily from business contraction, not structural change. A 2025 Australian greenwashing ruling—AUD $8.25M fine for misleading ocean plastic claims—exposes a gap between sustainability messaging and product reality. Downstream ecosystem impacts from bleach-based products remain unquantified.
The Clorox Company scores 41/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score. Last verified May 2026.
That places The Clorox Company joint 384th of 934 companies scored, and joint 17th of 45 in FMCG / Consumer Goods.
What is The Clorox Company doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Carbon Footprint: Operations and Energy Source (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Emissions Trajectory (4/10, 5/10).
Where The Clorox Company lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
- Emissions from its own operations8/10No verified figures published with their method and a falling trend.
- Emissions from its supply chain6/10No full value-chain map or supplier engagement programme.
- Whether its emissions are falling5/10No evidence of a year-on-year fall in its total emissions.
- How clean its energy is7/10Less than 90% of its energy shown to be renewable.
- Its effect on nature4/10Its effect on nature isn't measured or independently verified.
- How it uses materials and handles waste6/10No verified figures for reuse and recycling across the business.
- Its effect on water5/10No measured water footprint with reduction targets.
- Its climate targets7/10Its targets aren't validated by the Science Based Targets initiative.
- How openly it reports6/10No annual impact report, or no pay linked to climate targets.
- Its record on controversies5/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is The Clorox Company's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleWhat evidence is The Clorox Company's score based on?
13 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
62% of them were published by The Clorox Company itself; the rest come from independent sources.
Scored on 4 April 2026 under an earlier version of our method. We're re-checking it under the current method.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current score and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does The Clorox Company compare with other fmcg / consumer goods companies?
Where The Clorox Company sits among fmcg / consumer goods peers.
Among the 45 major fmcg / consumer goods brands we've scored, The Clorox Company is tied =17th of 45, with 4 others.
Who scores higher in FMCG / Consumer Goods?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above The Clorox Company.
Natracare reports its first comprehensive carbon footprint (2,664 tCO2e, 99% Scope 3) but the Scope 3 calculation is internally inconsistent, missing end-of-life and downstream transport.
See the breakdown →Estée Lauder has locked in strong operational emissions reductions (37.6% since 2018) and renewable energy, but Scope 3 emissions—95% of its footprint—rose 10% absolute while targets remain intensity-based.
See the breakdown →General Mills reports comprehensively on Scope 1 and 2 emissions with third-party verification and has nearly reached 100% renewable electricity.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score.