Natura &Co Holding sustainability score: 46/100
Natura &Co is a Brazilian cosmetics and personal care company founded in 1969, headquartered in São Paulo. The world's largest B Corp, it operates across Latin America, North America, and Europe through brands including Natura, Avon, and The Body Shop.
More about Natura &Co Holding
The company integrates Amazon sourcing and socio-biodiversity into its core business model.
Founded 1969Head office São Paulo, BrazilStaff ~35,000Revenue ~BRL 24.1B (~$4.5B USD)Website ↗
Natura &Co demonstrates strong biodiversity leadership and transparent climate accountability, having exceeded its 2030 Scope 1&2 target early. Weaknesses: supply chain carbon lacks quantified Scope 3 data, renewable energy sourcing unverified, water and waste metrics absent from current reporting.
Natura &Co Holding scores 46/100 (Making progress) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score. Last verified May 2026.
That places Natura &Co Holding joint 256th of 934 companies scored, and joint 8th of 45 in FMCG / Consumer Goods.
What is Natura &Co Holding doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Transparency & Accountability (8/10, 8/10). Weakest on Energy Source and Water Impact (5/10, 5/10).
Where Natura &Co Holding lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
- Emissions from its own operations7/10Its own emissions aren't independently verified or tracked over several years.
- Emissions from its supply chain6/10No full value-chain map or supplier engagement programme.
- Whether its emissions are falling7/10No consistent fall over several years across its operations and supply chain.
- How clean its energy is5/10Less than half its energy shown to be renewable, or no transition plan.
- Its effect on nature8/10No measurable net gain for nature.
- How it uses materials and handles waste6/10No verified figures for reuse and recycling across the business.
- Its effect on water5/10No measured water footprint with reduction targets.
- Its climate targets7/10Its targets aren't validated by the Science Based Targets initiative.
- How openly it reports8/10No mission-locked structure, such as B Corp certification.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is Natura &Co Holding's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleWhat evidence is Natura &Co Holding's score based on?
10 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
50% of them were published by Natura &Co Holding itself; the rest come from independent sources.
Scored on 5 April 2026 under an earlier version of our method. We're re-checking it under the current method.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current score and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does Natura &Co Holding compare with other fmcg / consumer goods companies?
Where Natura &Co Holding sits among fmcg / consumer goods peers.
Among the 45 major fmcg / consumer goods brands we've scored, Natura &Co Holding is tied =8th of 45, with 1 other.
Who scores higher in FMCG / Consumer Goods?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Natura &Co Holding.
Weleda has strong biodiversity credentials and a clean controversies record, but emissions data is largely undisclosed.
See the breakdown →Lush has built genuine structural sustainability into its model—naked products, renewable electricity, supplier monitoring—but absolute emissions are rising and it lacks science-aligned targets.
See the breakdown →Neal's Yard Remedies demonstrates genuine operational sustainability—renewable energy, organic sourcing, biodiversity advocacy—but relies on carbon offsets rather than absolute emissions reductions and publishes no quantified footprint data.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score.