L'Occitane Group sustainability score: 50/100
, was incorporated in Luxembourg in 2000 and its roots go back to 1976. 6 billion sales in the year to March 2026.
Founded 2000Head office Geneva, SwitzerlandStaff ~11,000 (FY2026)Revenue ~€2.6B (FY to March 2026)Website ↗
L'Occitane's total footprint has risen 35% since FY2020 to 452,000 tCO2e, though it fell 5% in the last year, and its value-chain targets are intensity-based. Its electricity is 100% renewable, about half through certificates. It uses less plastic in its packaging, but campaigners have criticised its refill pouches, and an ethical rating flagged uncertified palm oil in 2022.
L'Occitane Group scores 50/100 (Making progress) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score. Last verified October 2026.
That places L'Occitane Group joint 156th of 900 companies scored, and 4th of 45 in FMCG / Consumer Goods.
What is L'Occitane Group doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (8/10, 8/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (2/10, 5/10).
Where L'Occitane Group lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
- Emissions from its own operations8/10No verified figures published with their method and a falling trend.
- Emissions from its supply chain8/10Its Scope 3 emissions aren't fully verified or falling year on year.
- Whether its emissions are falling2/10No evidence its emissions are falling, not even from energy bills or mileage.
- How clean its energy is7/10Less than 90% of its energy shown to be renewable.
- Its effect on nature5/10Its effect on nature isn't measured or independently verified.
- How it uses materials and handles waste6/10No verified figures for reuse and recycling across the business.
- Its effect on water6/10No water stewardship programme or verified fall in water use.
- Its climate targets8/10No validated long-term net zero target.
- How openly it reports7/10No annual impact report, or no pay linked to climate targets.
- Its record on controversies6/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is L'Occitane Group's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleWhat evidence is L'Occitane Group's score based on?
16 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
19% of them were published by L'Occitane Group itself; the rest come from independent sources.
13 of 16 sources are independent of the company.
“Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions (tCO₂eq) 5,021 3,147 3,907”
“The company has pledged to reduce its Scope 3 emissions intensity by 97% by 2050.”
“It uses a majority of renewable energy to power its production sites”
“The roadmap was formed based on the recommendations of the Science Based Target Network (SBTN).”
“reduce plastic used for its packaging by 10 percent by 2025”
“In 2022 L'Occitane was given Ethical Consumer’s worst rating for its use of uncertified palm oil.”
“Under fire from Changing Markets Foundation for its refill concept was L’Occitane.”
“Since the study, the Group's production facilities have reduced water usage by 25%.”
“58% of the company’s total water consumption occurs in upstream supply chain operations”
“The Group also plans to eliminate air freight by 2030 for the transport of its products.”
“L’OCCITANE Group is committed to having a positive impact on people and regenerating nature through empowerment.”
“Wellness and beauty brand the L’Occitane Group has attained B Corp certification.”
“L’OCCITANE Group is registered in the EU Transparency Register”
“This piece was published without L’OCCITANE’s knowledge or consent”
“Changing Markets Foundation’s greenwash.com lists P&G, L’Oreal and L’Occitane”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current score and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does L'Occitane Group compare with other fmcg / consumer goods companies?
Where L'Occitane Group sits among fmcg / consumer goods peers.
Among the 45 major fmcg / consumer goods brands we've scored, L'Occitane Group sits 4th of 45.
Who scores higher in FMCG / Consumer Goods?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above L'Occitane Group.
Faith in Nature operates a small UK personal care manufacturer with genuine renewable energy infrastructure and governance innovation (Nature on the Board).
See the breakdown →Dr.
See the breakdown →Seventh Generation has achieved operational decarbonization and strong B Corp credentials, but emissions reductions stalled in 2024 despite intensity improvements.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
See what's behind your number →Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score.