Chopard sustainability score: 45/100
Chopard is a Swiss luxury watchmaker and jeweler founded in 1860, headquartered in Meyrin. The company operates manufacturing facilities in Geneva and Fleurier, sources precious metals and gemstones globally, and operates boutiques internationally.
More about Chopard
It employs approximately 3,000 people and is owned by the founding family.
Founded 1860Head office Meyrin, SwitzerlandStaff ~3,000Revenue ~$750MWebsite ↗
Chopard has published its first formal sustainability report and committed to SBTi-aligned targets, but lacks verified emissions data across all scopes. Supply chain carbon footprint remains unquantified despite high-risk sourcing of gold, diamonds, and gemstones. Energy transition at Swiss facilities is credible; accountability mechanisms are weak for a private company.
Chopard scores 45/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score. Last verified May 2026.
That places Chopard joint 280th of 934 companies scored, and joint 10th of 45 in FMCG / Consumer Goods.
What is Chopard doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Energy Source and Controversies & Red Flags (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Carbon Footprint: Operations (3/10, 4/10).
Where Chopard lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
- Emissions from its own operations4/10No full Scope 1 and 2 figures worked out to the GHG Protocol.
- Emissions from its supply chain4/10Most of its supply-chain (Scope 3) emissions aren't measured.
- Whether its emissions are falling3/10No evidence its emissions are falling, not even from energy bills or mileage.
- How clean its energy is7/10Less than 90% of its energy shown to be renewable.
- Its effect on nature5/10Its effect on nature isn't measured or independently verified.
- How it uses materials and handles waste6/10No verified figures for reuse and recycling across the business.
- Its effect on water5/10No measured water footprint with reduction targets.
- Its climate targets5/10Its targets aren't science-based or committed to the Science Based Targets initiative.
- How openly it reports5/10No dedicated sustainability role, board oversight or public report.
- Its record on controversies7/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is Chopard's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleWhat evidence is Chopard's score based on?
8 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
63% of them were published by Chopard itself; the rest come from independent sources.
Scored on 9 April 2026 under an earlier version of our method. We're re-checking it under the current method.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current score and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does Chopard compare with other fmcg / consumer goods companies?
Where Chopard sits among fmcg / consumer goods peers.
Among the 45 major fmcg / consumer goods brands we've scored, Chopard is tied =10th of 45, with 1 other.
Who scores higher in FMCG / Consumer Goods?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Chopard.
Neal's Yard Remedies demonstrates genuine operational sustainability—renewable energy, organic sourcing, biodiversity advocacy—but relies on carbon offsets rather than absolute emissions reductions and publishes no quantified footprint data.
See the breakdown →L'Oréal has cut operational emissions 51% since 2019 and reached 97% renewable energy, but total emissions rose above 2019 baseline due to Scope 3 increases.
See the breakdown →Natura &Co demonstrates strong biodiversity leadership and transparent climate accountability, having exceeded its 2030 Scope 1&2 target early.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score.