Van Cleef & Arpels scores 34/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment — scored from public data only, no company payment can change a number. Last verified May 2026.
That places Van Cleef & Arpels joint 368th of 596 companies scored, and joint 31st of 42 in FMCG / Consumer Goods.
Van Cleef & Arpels hides behind Richemont's group-level reporting with no brand-specific sustainability disclosure. Absolute emissions are rising, Scope 3 targets are intensity-only, and supply chain transparency is minimal. Precious materials sourcing—gold, diamonds, gemstones—remains unverified for environmental impact.
This score is built from public data only. If your practice is stronger than your disclosure, submit evidence for review — or challenge any question, free.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Energy Source (8/10, 5/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Carbon Footprint — Operations (2/10, 2/10).
12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
6 of 12 sources are third-party verified or public record.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Where Van Cleef & Arpels sits among fmcg / consumer goods peers.
Among the 42 major fmcg / consumer goods brands we've scored, Van Cleef & Arpels is tied =31st of 42, with 3 others.
Score history begins 9 April 2026.
As Van Cleef & Arpels's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
This score is not currently being contested.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Van Cleef & Arpels is a luxury jewelry and watch maison founded in 1896 and headquartered in Paris. Now owned by Richemont Group, the brand specializes in high-end precious jewelry featuring diamonds, rubies, sapphires, and gold. It operates 65+ boutiques globally with manufacturing and administrative functions.
Luxury jewelry peer; also Richemont-owned, similarly opaque on brand-level sustainability disclosures
View breakdown →Luxury jewelry competitor with stronger standalone sustainability reporting and recycled precious metals targets
View breakdown →Luxury conglomerate with similar supply-chain opacity in gemstones and precious metals, comparable scale
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.