Green People is a tiny, clean cosmetics company with founder-driven ethics but no emissions data, formal targets, or governance structure. It scores well on nature funding and controversies but fails on carbon accountability, energy transparency, and measurable commitments—essential even for small manufacturers.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (9/10, 6/10). Weakest on Targets & Commitments and Energy Source (2/10, 2/10).
7 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 41 major fmcg / consumer goods brands we've scored, Green People sits 29th of 41.
Score history begins 5 April 2026.
As Green People's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Green People is a UK-based organic cosmetics manufacturer founded in 1994, producing skincare, beauty, and sun care products. The ~30-person company operates from a single site in West Grinstead, sources certified organic ingredients globally, and donates over 10% profits to environmental charities. It holds Soil Association and ethical accreditation but operates without formal sustainability reporting.
UK organic beauty brand with similar scale and founder-driven ethics but stronger sustainability disclosure.
View breakdown →Cosmetics manufacturer with higher transparency and formal environmental commitments; useful accountability benchmark.
View breakdown →Organic cosmetics peer with certified sourcing; demonstrates feasibility of emissions reporting at small scale.
View breakdown →UK ethical beauty brand; similar founder-led model highlights common barriers to formal sustainability governance.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.