Lush has built genuine structural sustainability into its model—naked products, renewable electricity, supplier monitoring—but absolute emissions are rising and it lacks science-aligned targets. The core gap: strong operational greening masks a 93.8% Scope 3 footprint with no quantified reduction pathway.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Energy Source (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Targets & Commitments (3/10, 4/10).
11 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 41 major fmcg / consumer goods brands we've scored, Lush Cosmetics is tied =5th of 41, with 1 other.
Score history begins 11 April 2026.
As Lush Cosmetics's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Lush Cosmetics is a UK-based FMCG company manufacturing handmade cosmetics, toiletries and bath products. Founded 1995 in Poole, it operates 900+ stores globally and is partly employee-owned. Known for animal-testing opposition and minimal packaging philosophy, it competes in premium natural cosmetics.
Peer brand with mission-driven sustainability model and third-party auditing, but also facing scope 3 scale challenges
View breakdown →Natural cosmetics competitor with similar naked/minimal packaging ethos and animal testing opposition
View breakdown →Direct cosmetics sector peer with established supply-chain ethics programme and community trade sourcing
View breakdown →Reference point for radical transparency, employee ownership models, and reduction-first (not offset-first) climate strategy
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.