Louis Vuitton reports comprehensive climate and environmental data via LVMH's group structures, achieving strong renewable energy adoption and Scope 1+2 reductions. However, absolute Scope 3 emissions—96% of the footprint—have flat-lined or grown while the company disguised stagnation through intensity metrics. Unresolved deforestation links in leather supply chains and misaligned trade association positions undermine credibility.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Energy Source (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Water Impact (3/10, 4/10).
15 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 41 major fmcg / consumer goods brands we've scored, Louis Vuitton sits 22nd of 41.
Score history begins 9 April 2026.
As Louis Vuitton's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Louis Vuitton is a luxury fashion house owned by LVMH, the world's largest luxury conglomerate, headquartered in Paris. The brand manufactures leather goods, clothing, and accessories, positioning itself at the premium end of the FMCG/consumer goods sector. It operates globally with significant environmental footprint from material sourcing, manufacturing, and logistics.
Direct luxury sector peer with similar supply chain exposure and intensity-vs-absolute emissions gap.
View breakdown →Fast-fashion competitor with lower price point; useful comparison on material sourcing transparency and labour vs environment trade-offs.
View breakdown →Comparable luxury fashion house with equivalent transparency challenges and nature-linked commodity exposure.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.