Recently scored: Dentsu, Omnicom, Publicis Groupe, WPP
Prada S.p.A.·Apparel (Durable / Outdoor)·Milan, Italy·Founded 1913·Last verified 25 April 2026
43
out of 100
Below expectationsPending Review

Prada reports comprehensive Scope 1&2 data and has surpassed near-term SBTi targets, but Scope 3—representing 90% of emissions—barely moved (1% year-on-year). Supply chain water and biodiversity impacts remain largely unquantified. Animal welfare policy drew public criticism as insufficient.

The calculation

Every score shows its working.

Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.

SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale
Industry base impact
Apparel (Durable / Outdoor) sector ceiling.
30 / 100
Performance score
Sum of the 10 rubric questions, scored 0–10 each.
52 / 100
Raw score
Weighted average before scale penalty.
(0.3 × 30) + (0.7 × 52) = 45.4
Scale penalty
Multiplier based on absolute emissions volume — physics-first.
× 0.95
Final score
Rounded. Below expectations.
43 / 100
The ten questions

Where Prada S.p.A. is strong, and where it isn't.

Strongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Targets & Commitments (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (3/10, 3/10).

Where the evidence comes from

Every document used, listed.

11 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.

[1]Third-party verified
Tracenable – Prada GHG Emissions
Unknown
Q1
View →
[2]Self-reported
Prada Climate Strategy
Ongoing
Q1Q8
View →
[3]Third-party verified
DitchCarbon – Prada Emissions Profile
Ongoing
Q2Q3
View →
[4]Third-party verified
Good On You – Prada Rating
Ongoing
Q2Q5Q7Q9Q10
View →
[5]Public record
Bloomberg – Drivers of Sustainable Change
Unknown
Q3Q8
View →
[6]Public record
Sustainability Magazine – Prada's Path to a Greener Future
Unknown
Q4
View →
[7]Public record
The Sustainable Innovation – Prada Sustainability
Unknown
Q4Q6Q7
View →
[8]Public record
LAV – Prada Animal Welfare Policy Criticism
Unknown
Q5Q10
View →
[9]Public record
Apart Style – Is Prada Fast Fashion?
Unknown
Q6
View →
[10]Self-reported
Prada Sustainability Report 2024
2024
Q9
View →
[11]Third-party verified
COSH – Textile Companies Headlines 2025
2025
Q10
View →

If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.

Prada S.p.A. in context

Where Prada S.p.A. sits among apparel (durable / outdoor) peers.

Among the 35 major apparel (durable / outdoor) brands we've scored, Prada S.p.A. sits 19th of 35.

19/35
Prada S.p.A.'s rank
43
Industry average
23
Industry low
58
Industry high
How this score has moved

Prada S.p.A.'s score over time.

today

Score history begins 6 April 2026.

As Prada S.p.A.'s score updates, the trajectory will appear here.

We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.

What's being contested

This score is not currently being contested.

Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.

No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.

About Prada S.p.A.

Prada S.p.A. is an Italian luxury fashion house founded in 1913, headquartered in Milan. The company designs and manufactures high-end apparel, leather goods, footwear, and accessories. Its supply chain spans leather tanning, textile production, and exotic skin sourcing, making it capital-intensive and materially complex within the durable apparel sector.

Founded
1913
Headquarters
Milan, Italy
Employees
~15,000
Annual revenue
~€5.4B
Company website ↗
Track Prada S.p.A.

We'll let you know when the score moves.

Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.

THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

HOW SINK STAYS INDEPENDENT

Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.