Moncler sustainability score: 48/100
Moncler is an Italian luxury outerwear and apparel company founded in 1952, headquartered in Grenoble-adjacent operations spanning premium down jackets, knitwear, and accessories. It operates a global brand portfolio including Stone Island and Remo Ruffini's creative direction, competing in the high-end performance and lifestyle segment against brands like Patagonia and The North Face.
Founded 1952Head office Palazzo Moncler, ItalyStaff ~7,917Revenue ~€3.1BWebsite ↗
Moncler reports comprehensive climate data and hit CDP A-list status, but its dominant Scope 3 emissions (98% of total) are governed by an intensity target that allows absolute emissions to rise with revenue growth. Nature impact disclosure remains incomplete, water action is underfunded, and reliance on voluntary carbon offsets undermines net-zero claims.
Moncler scores 48/100 (Making progress) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score. Last verified May 2026.
That places Moncler joint 210th of 934 companies scored, and joint 11th of 43 in Apparel (Durable / Outdoor).
What is Moncler doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Energy Source and Carbon Footprint: Operations (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Emissions Trajectory (4/10, 5/10).
Where Moncler lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
- Emissions from its own operations7/10Its own emissions aren't independently verified or tracked over several years.
- Emissions from its supply chain6/10No full value-chain map or supplier engagement programme.
- Whether its emissions are falling5/10No evidence of a year-on-year fall in its total emissions.
- How clean its energy is8/10Its own operations aren't shown to run on 100% renewable energy.
- Its effect on nature5/10Its effect on nature isn't measured or independently verified.
- How it uses materials and handles waste6/10No verified figures for reuse and recycling across the business.
- Its effect on water4/10No measured water footprint with reduction targets.
- Its climate targets5/10Its targets aren't science-based or committed to the Science Based Targets initiative.
- How openly it reports7/10No annual impact report, or no pay linked to climate targets.
- Its record on controversies7/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is Moncler's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleWhat evidence is Moncler's score based on?
12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
58% of them were published by Moncler itself; the rest come from independent sources.
Scored on 7 June 2026 under an earlier version of our method. We're re-checking it under the current method.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current score and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does Moncler compare with other apparel (durable / outdoor) companies?
Where Moncler sits among apparel (durable / outdoor) peers.
Among the 43 major apparel (durable / outdoor) brands we've scored, Moncler is tied =11th of 43, with 4 others.
Who scores higher in Apparel (Durable / Outdoor)?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Moncler.
Patagonia has embedded environmental mission into its ownership structure and publishes comprehensive annual disclosure, but absolute emissions are climbing 25% above 2017 baseline.
See the breakdown →Allbirds has built credible carbon footprint transparency—LCA-verified, product-labeled, methodologically open-sourced—but much of its reported absolute emissions decline stems from a 45% revenue collapse and store closures, not genuine decarbonization.
See the breakdown →Veja has built genuine sustainability credentials in sourcing—Amazonian rubber, organic cotton, and responsible leather—with B Corp certification and a clean controversy record.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Companies can never pay for anything about their own score.