Levi Strauss scores 45/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment — scored from public data only, no company payment can change a number. Last verified May 2026.
That places Levi Strauss joint 162nd of 596 companies scored, and joint 16th of 36 in Apparel (Durable / Outdoor).
Levi Strauss has built credible climate infrastructure—SBTi-validated targets, 81% Scope 1+2 reduction, 100% renewable electricity. But absolute emissions remain massive at 3.7M tonnes annually, Scope 3 reduction lags at 8% against 42% targets, and cotton-heavy supply chains still drive 97% of freshwater impact. Sustainability reporting lacks full third-party assurance.
This score is built from public data only. If your practice is stronger than your disclosure, submit evidence for review — or challenge any question, free.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Energy Source and Targets & Commitments (8/10, 8/10). Weakest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Transparency & Accountability (5/10, 6/10).
12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
7 of 12 sources are third-party verified or public record.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Where Levi Strauss sits among apparel (durable / outdoor) peers.
Among the 36 major apparel (durable / outdoor) brands we've scored, Levi Strauss is tied =16th of 36, with 3 others.
Score history begins 4 April 2026.
As Levi Strauss's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
This score is not currently being contested.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Levi Strauss & Co. is a US-based apparel manufacturer founded in 1853, headquartered in San Francisco. Best known for durable denim jeans, the company operates a global supply chain spanning cotton cultivation, wet finishing, and retail. A public company with annual revenues exceeding $5 billion, it competes in the premium casual wear segment.
Peer apparel manufacturer with similar supply-chain emissions scale and SBTi targets; comparable water and labour accountability gaps.
View breakdown →Fast-fashion competitor with smaller sustainability footprint; illustrates trade-offs between durability strategy and production volume.
View breakdown →Apparel peer with comparable Scope 3 challenges, renewable energy commitments, and historical labour/pollution controversies.
View breakdown →Industry benchmark for circular design, durability-first philosophy, and unaudited-but-transparent reporting as alternative governance model.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.