Allbirds scores 49/100 (Making progress) on SINK's independent climate assessment — scored from public data only, no company payment can change a number. Last verified May 2026.
That places Allbirds joint 103rd of 596 companies scored, and joint 9th of 36 in Apparel (Durable / Outdoor).
Allbirds has built credible carbon footprint transparency—LCA-verified, product-labeled, methodologically open-sourced—but much of its reported absolute emissions decline stems from a 45% revenue collapse and store closures, not genuine decarbonization. Water and biodiversity management remain largely unquantified. Legal wins against greenwashing claims mask ongoing academic criticism of methodology.
This score is built from public data only. If your practice is stronger than your disclosure, submit evidence for review — or challenge any question, free.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Resource Use & Waste (3/10, 5/10).
12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
7 of 12 sources are third-party verified or public record.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Where Allbirds sits among apparel (durable / outdoor) peers.
Among the 36 major apparel (durable / outdoor) brands we've scored, Allbirds is tied =9th of 36, with 1 other.
Score history begins 8 February 2026.
As Allbirds's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
This score is not currently being contested.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Allbirds is a San Francisco-based footwear and apparel company founded in 2014, known for wool and sustainable material shoes. It operates direct-to-consumer and wholesale channels and achieved B Corp certification. The company is undergoing acquisition and faced significant financial challenges in 2023–2024.
Pioneer in transparent climate reporting and regenerative supply chains, industry-setting benchmark for footwear and apparel
View breakdown →Larger footwear competitor with similar per-product carbon labeling and supply chain scope questions around absolute vs. intensity metrics
View breakdown →Major sports apparel manufacturer with comparable renewable energy targets and greenwashing litigation exposure
View breakdown →Direct-to-consumer fashion brand emphasizing transparency and sustainable materials with comparable circular economy initiatives
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.