Hermès reports strong operational decarbonization and renewable energy adoption, but masks absolute supply-chain emissions growth through intensity metrics. Exotic leather sourcing — including owned crocodile farms and repeated PETA investigations — represents unresolved animal welfare and biodiversity harm. Disclosure is comprehensive but circular-economy claims lack closed-loop proof.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Energy Source (8/10, 8/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Controversies & Red Flags (4/10, 5/10).
16 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 35 major apparel (durable / outdoor) brands we've scored, Hermès International sits 12th of 35.
Score history begins 4 April 2026.
As Hermès International's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Hermès International is a French luxury goods conglomerate founded in 1837, headquartered in Paris. Specialising in leather goods, silk, fragrances, and watches, the company operates 60 manufacturing sites globally. Known for handcrafted quality and high price points, Hermès sits at the premium end of the apparel and accessories market.
Peer luxury conglomerate with similar scale; direct comparison on exotic-skin sourcing and supply-chain transparency.
View breakdown →Larger luxury competitor; useful benchmark for carbon intensity targets and Scope 3 absolute versus intensity framing.
View breakdown →Mission-driven apparel brand; contrasts circular-economy claims with actual closed-loop material cycles.
View breakdown →Transparency and animal-welfare standard-setter; highlights gap between Hermès governance and verifiable ethical supply chains.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.