adidas scores 42/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment — scored from public data only, no company payment can change a number. Last verified May 2026.
That places adidas joint 216th of 596 companies scored, and joint 22nd of 36 in Apparel (Durable / Outdoor).
Adidas discloses emissions comprehensively under GHG Protocol but remains off-track for 2030 climate targets, with absolute emissions rising year-on-year despite intensity gains. A 2025 German court ruling upheld misleading climate advertising claims. Energy transition relies heavily on unbundled instruments rather than additionality; supply chain renewable penetration at 24% is weak.
This score is built from public data only. If your practice is stronger than your disclosure, submit evidence for review — or challenge any question, free.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Controversies & Red Flags and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (5/10, 5/10).
19 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Where adidas sits among apparel (durable / outdoor) peers.
Among the 36 major apparel (durable / outdoor) brands we've scored, adidas is tied =22nd of 36, with 1 other.
Score history begins 4 April 2026.
As adidas's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
This score is not currently being contested.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Adidas AG, founded in 1924 and headquartered in Herzogenaurach, Germany, designs and manufactures athletic footwear, apparel, and sports equipment. A global leader in the sportswear sector with €21.4bn FY2023 revenue and 59,030 employees, it competes directly with Nike and PUMA across retail and wholesale channels.
Direct sector competitor; higher CDP rating and more transparent supply chain renewable data disclosure.
View breakdown →Sector peer with comparable supply chain footprint; leads Adidas on clean energy transparency per Stand.earth.
View breakdown →Apparel giant; contrasting vertical integration model and circular ambition scope relative to Adidas wholesale structure.
View breakdown →Large multinational with similar science-based target validation and greenwashing controversy exposure.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.