Jimmy Choo discloses sustainability data only at parent-company Capri Holdings level, obscuring brand-specific performance. Scope 3 emissions are rising, deforestation risk in leather supply chains remains unresolved despite policy commitments, and science-based targets are insufficiently ambitious. Third-party assessments rate the brand 'Not Good Enough' overall.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Energy Source (5/10, 4/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Emissions Trajectory (2/10, 2/10).
6 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 35 major apparel (durable / outdoor) brands we've scored, Jimmy Choo sits 32nd of 35.
Score history begins 9 April 2026.
As Jimmy Choo's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Jimmy Choo is a British luxury footwear and accessories brand founded in 1976, headquartered in London. Known for high-end women's shoes, handbags, and leather goods, it operates approximately 234 stores globally. Since 2011, it has been owned by Capri Holdings, which also owns Versace and Michael Kors. The brand positions itself in the premium segment of the apparel and accessories market.
Luxury conglomerate with similar leather-intensive supply chains and deforestation exposure, higher disclosure granularity.
View breakdown →Largest luxury goods group by scale; higher environmental ambition and transparency standards than Capri Holdings.
View breakdown →Apparel peer with stronger science-based target validation, higher renewable energy adoption, and brand-level emissions reporting.
View breakdown →Fast-fashion competitor with more granular sustainability disclosure by brand and higher circular economy programme maturity.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.