Elvis & Kresse operates a genuinely circular business model built on waste-stream materials, eliminating virgin inputs entirely. Its farm-based operations achieve 74% on-site renewable energy and near-zero fossil fuel use. The critical gap: no formal emissions targets, no Scope 3 inventory, and no end-of-life product take-back scheme despite being a textiles company.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Resource Use & Waste and Controversies & Red Flags (9/10, 9/10). Weakest on Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain and Carbon Footprint — Operations (4/10, 4/10).
11 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 35 major apparel (durable / outdoor) brands we've scored, Elvis & Kresse is tied =2nd of 35, with 1 other.
Score history begins 9 April 2026.
As Elvis & Kresse's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Elvis & Kresse is a UK-based luxury accessories brand specialising in durable goods made entirely from post-industrial waste streams—decommissioned fire hoses, leather off-cuts, parachute silk. Founded in 2005, it operates its own workshops in Kent and Istanbul, owns a 17-acre regenerative farm, and has diverted over 300 tonnes of material from landfill. It is a B Corp certified since 2015.
Outdoor durables brand with regenerative supply chain commitment; both prioritise long-term material stewardship over growth.
View breakdown →Fashion brand pursuing circular business model; similar waste-reduction ethos but Reformation operates at larger scale with more formal climate targets.
View breakdown →Luxury accessories using reclaimed and alternative materials; comparable direct-to-consumer positioning and supply chain transparency claims.
View breakdown →Apparel brand with regenerative agriculture integration and habitat restoration focus; analogous farm-based sustainability model.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.