Vivobarefoot scores 38/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment — scored from public data only, no company payment can change a number. Last verified May 2026.
That places Vivobarefoot joint 291st of 596 companies scored, and 26th of 36 in Apparel (Durable / Outdoor).
Vivobarefoot demonstrates strong transparency and circularity ambition—ReVivo resales hit 15% of revenue, B Corp certified, publishes radical failure disclosure. But emissions remain largely unmeasured: no Scope 3 quantification, no reduction targets, no water strategy. Growth masks untracked footprint.
This score is built from public data only. If your practice is stronger than your disclosure, submit evidence for review — or challenge any question, free.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Transparency & Accountability (9/10, 7/10). Weakest on Targets & Commitments and Water Impact (2/10, 2/10).
12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
6 of 12 sources are third-party verified or public record.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Where Vivobarefoot sits among apparel (durable / outdoor) peers.
Among the 36 major apparel (durable / outdoor) brands we've scored, Vivobarefoot sits 26th of 36.
Score history begins 5 April 2026.
As Vivobarefoot's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
This score is not currently being contested.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Vivobarefoot is a UK-based footwear brand founded in 1976, specializing in minimalist, barefoot-inspired shoes. Operating as a fabless brand with outsourced Asian manufacturing, it positions itself around regenerative design, circular models, and nature restoration funding via the Livebarefoot Fund.
Peer footwear brand with similar circular ambitions but stronger emissions trajectory documentation.
View breakdown →Industry leader in radical transparency, B-Corp governance, and regenerative claims backed by quantified targets.
View breakdown →Sustainable footwear competitor with stronger supply-chain traceability and water impact disclosure.
View breakdown →Fashion peer with comparable transparency reporting and nature commitments but more advanced emissions baselines.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.