Valentino reports carbon reductions and renewable energy in Italy, but lacks science-based targets, supply chain emissions transparency, and water accountability. A May 2025 judicial administration order found its subsidiary culpably failed to prevent worker exploitation across Chinese subcontractors—systemic oversight failure despite prior industry scandals.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Emissions Trajectory (5/10, 5/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (2/10, 2/10).
9 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 35 major apparel (durable / outdoor) brands we've scored, Valentino S.p.A. sits 30th of 35.
Score history begins 9 April 2026.
As Valentino S.p.A.'s score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Valentino S.p.A. is an Italian luxury fashion house founded in 1976, headquartered in Rome. The company designs and manufactures haute couture, ready-to-wear, accessories, and fragrance, operating a global retail network across Europe, Asia, Americas, and the Middle East. A subsidiary of Mayhoola for Investments since 2014.
Luxury conglomerate competitor with stronger renewable energy and circular commitments, but faces similar supply-chain transparency gaps.
View breakdown →Larger luxury group with higher science-based target ambition and third-party assurance; still weak on supplier labour oversight.
View breakdown →Fast-fashion rival with faster emissions disclosure pace and supply-chain audit infrastructure; labour controversies also documented.
View breakdown →Direct luxury apparel peer; comparable carbon reporting maturity but stronger circular-economy portfolio and governance transparency.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.