VF Corp discloses comprehensively but delivers unevenly. Scope 1&2 emissions fell 29% from baseline, but Scope 3—the bulk of footprint—remains 19% above baseline and is tracking to miss its 2030 target. Renewable energy actually regressed from 36% to 29%. Water and biodiversity accountability are absent.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (7/10, 6/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Emissions Trajectory (3/10, 3/10).
16 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 35 major apparel (durable / outdoor) brands we've scored, The North Face (VF Corporation) sits 29th of 35.
Score history begins 4 April 2026.
As The North Face (VF Corporation)'s score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
VF Corporation is a multinational apparel and footwear conglomerate headquartered in Denver, Colorado, with iconic brands including The North Face, Vans, Timberland, and Smartwool. A major player in outdoor and durable apparel, VF operates a global supply chain of 1,200+ factories and generated approximately $11.4 billion in revenue as of FY2025. The company is a RE100 member and has published SBTi-validated climate targets.
Comparable scale outdoor/apparel giant with similar supply chain emissions burden and SBTi targets
View breakdown →Large apparel manufacturer with ambitious renewable energy targets and comparable Scope 3 decarbonisation challenges
View breakdown →Fast-fashion competitor with higher production volume, relevant for assessing circular economy maturity gaps
View breakdown →Outdoor apparel peer with stronger transparency and circular economy integration; useful accountability benchmark
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.