PUMA reports comprehensive climate data with third-party verification and achieved early SBT targets, but relies heavily on unbundled renewable energy credits without additionality. Significant ongoing controversies over Palestinian settlement sponsorship, greenwashing allegations, and worker rights issues substantially weaken its sustainability credibility despite operational emissions reductions.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Carbon Footprint — Operations and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Controversies & Red Flags and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (3/10, 5/10).
16 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 35 major apparel (durable / outdoor) brands we've scored, Puma sits 21st of 35.
Score history begins 4 April 2026.
As Puma's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
PUMA is a German multinational sportswear and footwear manufacturer founded in 1948, headquartered in Herzogenaurach. It designs and distributes athletic shoes, apparel, and accessories across football, running, training, and lifestyle categories, competing with Nike and Adidas in the global performance and casual sportswear market.
Direct competitor with similar scale, climate targets, and supply chain complexity in apparel sector.
View breakdown →Peer sportswear giant with higher brand profile but comparable emissions footprint and factory governance challenges.
View breakdown →Large apparel manufacturer with comparable REC-reliance concerns and fast-fashion production model sustainability tensions.
View breakdown →Apparel sector peer with similar biodiversity risk exposure, supply chain transparency gaps, and circular economy targeting.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.